Many people view E-Collars (sometimes called ‘shock collars) as an ‘Easy button’ meant to startle and punish a dog that is acting out. This is labeled as ‘aversive’ training and rightfully so.

The belief that this is how all E-Collars are used is unfortunately what gives E-Collars a BAD name, however. It’s important to note that a heavy-handed, aversive, forceful punishment-based approach is the exact opposite of how an E-Collar should be used.

Today we are dispelling some common MYTHS about E-Collars and E-Collar training, so that you can make an informed decision. 

MYTH # 1: SHOCK COLLARS AND E-COLLARS ARE THE SAME THING

E-Collars and Shock collars look similar but they are very, very different tools.

You can read our blog post on this topic by clicking HERE.

E-Collars provide a blunt, tactile  muscle stimulation that feels like ants marching or a gentle tingle, and 100 levels to choose from.

Shock collars provide a sharp static correction is meant to HURT, with only a few levels to choose from.

If your goal is to hurt, startle, scare or intimidate your dog like they did back in 2001 I suppose a shock collar will work just fine. But shock collars SUCK. They deserve their sketchy reputation.

Proper E-Collars run $180 or MORE. They cannot be compared to or used the same way as cheap garbage shock collars from Amazon.
Read on…

MYTH #2: E-COLLARS MAKE DOGS FEARFUL AND ANXIOUS

Incorrectly used shock collars can absolutely make a dog fearful, anxious or even aggressive.

But so can incorrectly used head harnesses, no-pull harnesses, squirt bottles, crates and even LEASHES!

Every single training tool, including those often labeled as ‘positive’ can be harmful or hurtful to a dog if used incorrectly.

Confusing, punishment based restrictive training methods including intimidation and ‘Alpha/Dominance’ are what lead to fear, anxiety and aggression.

The tactile communication from a properly used E-Collar is more gentle than the tactile communication from a leash, no-pull harness, head collar, or tension on the neck from pulling.

That’s a fact, and one that tends to surprise a lot of people.

MYTH #3: E-COLLARS ARE EXTREMELY AVERSIVE

Let’s compare a popular ‘positive’ dog training tool to a properly used E-Collar.

HEAD COLLAR. Head collars cause many dogs to paw, whine, become frantic or shut down.
It is a rare dog who will accept a head collar without having a problem with it straight out of the gate. Halti and Gentle Leaders rely on tactile pressure, even just by being worn.

Head collars require counter-conditioning and desensitization that often takes days or weeks. The dog will always experience constant pressure from the head collar and may injure themselves if they pull or lunge against it, even just to sniff the ground.

Head collars are considered a ‘friendly’ tool and are used by many ‘positive’ trainers despite the fact that they rely heavily on positive punishment and pressure.
The same thing is true when it comes to front-clip and no-pull harnesses., which also rely on pressure/punishment and obstructing the way a dog moves. These are  NOT ‘positive’ or ‘force-free’ tools.

E-COLLAR. E-Collars are introduced at a low level and paired with treats. Dogs do not shut down, become frantic or show signs of fear. Instead, they feel the stimulation and become very excited about it, all within minutes of being fully introduced to the tool! They know that the gentle stim = treats and good things.

This gentle stimulation is a tactile/touch sensation that feels like tiny ants crawling on the skin and can be used to communicate to the dog that redirecting back to the handler and ignoring distractions that cause lunging, barking or pulling is always a good thing.

I don’t know about you, but I’d MUCH rather feel a small occasional tingle (that I know how to respond to and know means good things when I do) than to spend my life restricted from natural movement with a long leash or a bunch of webbing clipped onto my chest or face.

MYTH #4: YOU CAN’T USE AN E-COLLAR AND STILL CLAIM TO BE POSITIVE

I suppose this is true if we are talking about those whom rely on shock, vibrate or high-level stim as an ‘easy button’ corrective tool.

We don’t support such unethical E-Collar use at all.

Slapping an electric collar on a dog and using it straight up as a corrective tool is NOT humane, ethical, positive or appropriate. We agree!

In the last decade, HUGE strides have been made in dog training and the modern E-Collar is not used that way AT ALL. 

Basically put, dog trainers, dog owners and rescues who believe that all E-Collar training involves zapping a dog every time it reacts or steps out of line are uneducated about E-Collar training and unwilling to have an open mind about it. 

The trainers who are doing E-Collar training correctly include people such as Larry Krohn and Tyler Muto, who use a hugely positive approach (lots of treats, praise, games and confidence building) and teach the E-Collar as a communication tool for off-leash reliability, not a correction tool.

They believe, as we do, that all foundational skills must first be taught without the E-Collar: sit, down, leave it, drop it, wait, come, place, stay and touch. 

They also believe that it is completely inappropriate to ‘light a dog up‘ for emotional and fear based reactivity, including barking, lunging, aggression and leash aggression. 

Run from any trainer who tells you to use the E-Collar to teach basic behaviors and then use it to ‘correct’ them with stim for not complying. That is NOT appropriate E-Collar training and IS the reason why this tool has such a negative reputation.

What does E-Collar training actually look like?

The first step is to condition the dog to the stimulation, by teaching them that it means really, really good things. Remember, this stimulation, for a large majority of dogs (even big, powerful Danes) is less than most humans can feel! 

Stim…treat. Stim…treat. Come…treat! Stim, Come….treat! YES!

If you watch the body language of a dog being conditioned to an E-Collar, you see loose posture, wagging tail, eye contact, drive and excitement. After a few repetitions, they feel the stim and become VERY excited and run to the handler.

Not unlike clicker training. Interesting. Unfortunately, MANY unethical trainers and uneducated dog owners completely skip the conditioning step and see the tool as a correction device for frustrating behaviors, and that’s unfortunate. 

When done correctly, the E-Collar becomes the leash and in many ways, is less aversive, less restrictive, and less harmful than a leash (especially if the dog pulls or lunges). In the first session with the E-Collar, most dogs learn quickly that stim = follow/come/be with me and they LOVE IT.

No leash pressure, no tension, no stress on the neck, chest or shoulders. The dog is free to move naturally and is simply asked, through a gentle stimulation and treats, to be responsive to the handler. They are not being corrected or punished, either.

It’s interesting how that is considered ‘forceful’ and damaging. We believe it’s simply ignorance and a lack of education, or people who prefer to outright judge,  have a closed mind and are unwilling to learn about this. 

MYTH #5: E-COLLARS HURT THE DOG

Modern E-Collars (view them here) have 100 levels of stimulation that can be increased incrementally.

Most dogs respond to stimulation levels of 10 or less.

For perspective, it’s important to understand that most humans cannot even feel the stimulation until it’s been set at a level of 12 or higher. 

MYTH #6 – E-COLLARS ARE UNNECESSARY

There is this idea out there that because a recall can be taught without an E-Collar, it should be and that there is no reason to add a tool to the mix.

But the truth is, when done correctly, E-Collar trained dogs are enthusiastic, happy, calm and often offered more freedom and autonomy than many other dogs.
How anybody can see that and say those dogs are abused is beyond us.

The E-Collar is an invisible leash. It gives an extra step of security on top an already outstanding, positively trained recall. 

So is it ‘necessary’? No. Is it extremely helpful and beneficial when it comes to safety and giving a dog additional freedom? YES.

If a positive-only trained recall is blown off, there is no backup.

The E-Collar is a great safety device. Positive-trained dogs would benefit from knowing and understand E-Collar stimulation for this reason. To go without is like riding without a seatbelt.

The E-Collar provides a gentle, crystal clear communication to the dog from a distance, which ultimately allows for much more freedom. The tactile sensation can be used to communicate to a dog that it needs to come back, walk away from somebody else on the path, or has gone too far away. It can be used in an emergency, if the dog decides to chase a squirrel into traffic.

A higher level of stimulation is less harmful in that last situation than if the dog were to hit the end of a long leash and be jammed up by the neck as a result. 

This is especially true for dogs that need to move naturally and explore in order to feel enriched.

‘Shocking’ and punishing a dog for blowing off a recall is NOT HOW IT WORKS. Applying a gentle tactile stimulation that they know how to respond to (come back and it goes away) IS how it works.

Interestingly enough, if you condition a dog correctly to the E-Collar, you rarely if ever have to use it. It’s not this ‘abusive’ tool of force that some people like to say it is. 

MYTH #7 – STUDIES SHOW E-COLLARS CAUSE STRESS

Not a single one of those studies, that we’ve found, studied dogs where the dog was conditioned to the E-Collar first and trained with a lot of positive reinforcement.

Shock and startle training will absolutely cause stress. Cheap shock collars CAUSE STRESS. Stimming dogs for messing up, especially when they don’t know what’s being asked of them,  will CAUSE STRESS.

Many of those studies lump shock collars and E-Collars together as the same tool; which they aren’t. The studies are not peer-reviewed. They are often biased and always extremely flawed.

Yet, people continue to cite them…even trainers who claim to be ‘science-based’.  There is nothing science-based about citing studies that were not correctly done.

Watch this video of Larry Krohn conditioning a dog to the E-Collar. Please send us an email and tell us where this dog is stressed, anxious or being forced.

MYTH #8: VIBRATE IS BETTER THAN ‘SHOCK’

Most shock collars and E-Collars come with a ‘vibrate’ function.

Many dog owners believe that ‘vibrate’ is a gentle way to correct their dog, and will proudly state that they use that and would ‘never use shock unless necessary’.

Remember, we believe that shock collars are absolute garbage. So yeah, shocking a dog is not ok. That’s not E-Collar training and shock and startle is not the most effective training, either.

Newsflash, though…vibrate mode is super-duper aversive to most dogs.

Does it succeed in punishing a dog for a behavior? Yup. Does it redirect dogs? Sure. Does it make owners feel ‘good’ about using it? Unfortunately, yes.

Take your vibration collar and put it in the palm of your hand to experience it. Have somebody else randomly hit the vibrate button when you aren’t paying attention.  It’s really annoying and startling.

Take a PROPER E-Collar (like the Educator series) and put it on a level 7 (average stim where most dogs enthusiastically work). Feel it on your body somewhere. Heck, bump it up to a 14 and try again.

Tell me which YOU would prefer.

Folks, vibration mode is bad. 

READY TO GET STARTED?

We rely heavily on positive reinforcement AND we use E-Collars to give our dogs security in their off-leash adventures.

Hello Danes is an authorized distributor of E-Collar Technologies products, and we are here to help you train your Great Dane in a positive, ethical way. Imagine off-leash freedom and more.

Let’s do this! Shop our collection of high-quality E-Collars for Great Danes here, and use code ECOLLARMAGIC for $10 off. Our E-Collars ship directly from the manufacturer. 

There is a massive difference between an E-Collar and shock collar. It’s frustrating that so many trainers and dog owners misunderstand E-Collars, because they are something that, as primarily positive trainers, we stand behind.

In other words, we don’t believe that they should have the same negative reputation as a tool of force and corrections that shock collars do.

Today, I wanted to address this and clear the air! If you’ve been around our blog a bit, you know that we support responsible E-Collar use, but NOT shock collars.

Interested in learning more about why? Read on…

SHOCK COLLAR:

+ Sharp static shock, similar to a hot electric fence or sticking your finger into an outlet
+ Designed to scare a dog away from a behavior
+ Often painful and always startling
+ Typically offers a warning beep and/or vibrate function, which can mislead dog owners into feeling they are using the tool humanely
+Relies on ‘easy button’ method training, where the dog is the subject of the training, not a participant in it
+Can cause frustration and confusion, especially with poor shock timing
+Scientifically proven to increase fearful and distressed body language, including lip licking, pinning ears, cowering and yelping
+Scientifically proven to increase reactivity and aggression
+Often sold inexpensively online and in pet stores
+Often, though not always also used for invisible fences. Barrier frustration is common.

E-COLLAR:

+ Blunt muscle stimulation, exactly like a TENS unit from a doctor or therapist
+ Designed to be a communication tool, not a correction tool
+ Not painful. Feels like a tickle or tiny ants
+ May offer a warning beep or blunt vibration, which many E-Collar trainers find they never use. Vibration is much more aversive than blunt stim to many dogs
+Relies on the dog having a positive association with the sensation, and being an active participant in training
+Enhances communication and reduces frustration. Allows for more freedom.
+When used correctly, is proven to be a humane and effective training method with no added fear or stress.
+Can increase confidence and freedom and reduce reactivity and aggression
+Only a few companies make E-Collars, they are more expensive and high quality
+Are becoming more common with electric fences, and can be used to teach boundaries.

SHOCK COLLARS & E-COLLARS ARE VERY DIFFERENT TOOLS

Many people resort to a shock collar when they’ve reached their limit with a dog that is exhibiting frustrating and dangerous behaviors such as jumping and running away.

The typical approach to shock collar training includes being ready to hit the ‘easy button’ and startle the dog using beep, vibrate or shock away from an inappropriate behavior.

This action is very rewarding to the person holding the remote, but often frustrating and confusing to the dog.

THE PROBLEM WITH SHOCK COLLARS

When a dog is unsure about the corrections or how to respond to them, they become confused. Many begin to show escalating signs of frustration and fear.

They may yelp, cower, tuck and run or even redirect their anxiety into reactivity. Many continue to ‘act out’ or are labeled as  ‘stubborn’ when they continue to repeat incorrect behaviors.

A lot of dog owners will ‘show the dog the remote’ as a threat to push them into compliance. The dog sees it and runs away, often cowering and showing subtle signs of stress. In this common scenario, the threat has become the tool, and that threat is heavily relied upon.

This practice creates a training environment where the dog is under control only because of fear and restrictions, not because they’ve actually been taught right from wrong and given freedom and autonomy. 

Shock and startle easy-button training is what gives electronic dog collars a bad name, and it’s a misconception we are out to fix.

Have you made this mistake in training your dog? Don’t stress and simply read on!

E-COLLAR TRAINING

The first step in E-Collar training is to establish the dogs ‘working level’. E-Collars are adjustable. The working level is the point where the dog feels the stimulation.

For many dogs, their ‘working level’ is almost imperceptible to humans. Imagine training your dog with something so gentle! It feels like a small tingle or ants crawling on the skin.

The next step is to pair the stimulation with positive things. Stim, treat. Stim, treat.

The dog quickly becomes EXCITED about the stim!

Proper E-Collar training does NOT rely on force, fear or harsh shock corrections.

Now, you may be asking how a large, in-charge dog could possibly be responsive to this, and that is where the magic of E-Collar training comes into play.

With E-Collars, the dog is an ACTIVE participant in the training. They learn exactly what the stimulation (communication) means and understand how to turn the stimulation down or off by making choices.

Turning the stimulation down and off is very rewarding to them, and many dogs enjoy the mental enrichment aspect. It builds their confidence, especially as the training allows them more freedom.

The stimulation is simply an annoyance; it’s not painful and it doesn’t have to scare them.

They also understand that the stimulation means ‘turn around’ and come back, because doing so always results in good things (especially at first).

When you do have to use a more intense stim to redirect your dog or get his/her attention in a dangerous or inappropriate situation, the dog knows exactly what to do and doesn’t associate the sensation with the environment.

Remember, E-Collar training is a lifestyle. Shock collar training is a bandaid.

Even large and ‘in-charge’ type dogs can make a complete 180 with proper training using positive reinforcement and the E-Collar as a communications tool.

THE BEST E-COLLARS FOR GREAT DANES

We stand by E-Collar Technologies training systems, which offer adjustable blunt stim and multi-dog models.

Shop E-Collars for your Great Dane here! We are an authorized distributor of E-Collar Technologies models and would love to help you give your dog off-leash freedom!

If you’ve previously used a shock collar, that’s ok! Start over again with the E-Collar. It’s a completely different tool and used a completely different way. We are here for you if you have questions!

A properly used E-Collar is MORE humane, MORE effective and LESS aversive than:

• vibration mode
• a leash
• a no-pull harness
• a head harness
• a prong or choke collar
• leash pressure
• a collar grab
• a harsh verbal correction
• a leash pop
• a spray bottle
• a can of pennies
• endless restrictions to freedom and autonomy because of dangerous behaviors such as fence jumping, excessive pulling and running away.
  
  Why do we stand behind E-Collars? Because happy, confident, well-trained dogs that have autonomy and freedom make excellent family pets and good canine citizens.

  Shop E-Collars, shipped quickly to you here. 

Do you E-Collar train? Share your experience below!

I am a 99% positive dog trainer and I believe that a properly used E-Collar is an appropriate, helpful and humane training aid for many dogs and owners. Positive trainers, hear me out!

E-Collars are greatly misunderstood! People believe they are a tool of corrections, punishment, and force…and we are ready to change that narrative.

If you are unsure what the difference is between an E-Collar and a Shock collar, click here to read our article about it. You may be surprised to learn that there is a HUGE difference!

The truth is that I’ve spent YEARS cringing at any kind of electronic collar, judging people for using them, and paying close attention to the unfortunate behavioral problems that resulted from their use.

Aggression, fear, confusion, and aloof behavior seemed common. It bothered me. Like many positive-leaning dog trainers, I was alarmed, frustrated, and sad.

Shock collars are a dated tool that relies on fear, pain, punishment, and force. This blog is NOT pro-shock collar. We are, however, pro-responsibly used E-collar. 

E-Collars are a modern invisible leash, and when used properly are less aversive and less harmful than:

-A long leash
-A no-pull or front-clip harness
-A head collar or Gentle Leader/Halti
-Running off and being lost, hurt, or killed
-Needless restrictions to freedom and choice done in the name of ‘positive only’ learning

What I had not yet realized at the time was that there was a growing movement of ethical, positive dog trainers who were using electronic collars in a different more dog-focused way. I was also unaware that an E-Collar is a very different device than a shock collar!

These trainers were actively speaking out against shock collars and inhumane training methods that relied on sharp static corrections and punishment.

I noticed that their E-Collar-trained dogs were happy, engaged, confident, and enjoyed freedoms that my dogs could only dream of. They were not aggressive, edgy, anxious, or aloof as the dogs I had seen trained with shock collars and there was no shouting, chasing, frustration, or constant management.

To put this simply, a properly used E-Collar is no more aversive than a collar, leash, or crate. Read on!

E-Collar Training for Dogs

Proper E-Collar training relies heavily on the dog having a POSITIVE association with the sensation. Modern E-Collars have 100 levels to choose from (like the Mini-Educator) so the communication for each dog is completely custom.

E-collars produce muscle stimulation, not a static shock. Most dogs enthusiastically work at stimulation levels that most humans cannot feel when they try it on themselves.

A lot of people say the sensation, when it’s turned up enough for them to feel it, is similar to marching ants or a small tingle.

The dog is taught to associate that feeling with treats and praise. When this is done correctly they become extremely engaged with and excited about the sensation and the training!

(It’s fun to put a proper E-Collar into the hands of somebody who is expecting to be shocked! They are always nervous because they do not yet understand and are anticipating being very uncomfortable. Once they feel it, their minds quickly change and they are laughing, curious, and asking questions!) 

E-Collar Conditioning

When the dog has been conditioned to their E-Collar as above, they learn that the stimulation means to turn and come back. redirect and try something different. It becomes a game for them where they are in control of the stimulation, including turning it down and off by enthusiastically returning (recall).

This is a very different approach than ‘shock and startle’, and allows for the handler to communicate clearly with the dog from a larger distance than with any of the other similar options listed above.

Think of an E-Collar like a walkie-talkie for your dog!

MORE AVERSIVE THAN AN E-COLLAR

Now that we understand the basic concept behind how E-Collars feel to the dog are meant to be used, we can look at training tools and methods that are aversive:

• Vibration. Many people rely on the ‘vibration’ button because they don’t want to shock their dog. That’s fair, shock collars SUCK. The truth however is that most dogs find a vibration to be MUCH more aversive than the stim (stimulation) from an E-Collar. Subtle signs of stress include lip licking, scratching, head shaking, cowering, hunched posture, stiffness, shaking off, pinned ears, and avoidance.
• Shock Collars. Shock collars deliver a sharp static correction that is painful and has been scientifically proven to increase stress, fear, and anxiety. We do NOT recommend shock collars, especially cheap ones from Amazon or pet stores. Shock collar training is a completely different practice and product than E-Collars and E-Collar training.
• Head Collars. These provide constant pressure/stimulation to the head and may cause an over-excited or frightful dog to whip their head around and potentially damage their spine. Head collars also require proper conditioning. Many dogs find them extremely aversive to wear and will pant, paw, become frantic, or shut down without proper slow early introductions and desensitization. They work because they are extremely aversive.
• No-Pull Harnesses. These harnesses rely on obstructing the way that the dog’s front limbs and shoulders move. They put constant pressure on the chest and impede natural movement, especially if the dog pulls. They are often seen as a ‘positive’ tool, despite this. We do not support the use of no-pull harnesses, nor the notion that they are ‘gentle’ and ‘positive’.
• Electric Invisible Fences. Most (not all) invisible fences rely on automated shock corrections. Shock-based invisible fences are known to increase reactivity and barrier frustration in the yard. The shock correction is typically very harsh and many dogs yelp or cower when they experience it. This includes the HALO GPS fence collar, which unlike an E-Collar, does not teach your dog enthusiastic recall – only avoidance. 
• Long Leashes. Long leashes are necessary before a dog has a reliable recall and in areas where being off-leash is illegal or unsafe. Ultimately, however, off-leash freedom (and the gentle stim from an E-Collar that can become the cue to return from a distance) is MUCH less aversive than always being on a long leash, or having the long leash used as a ‘fishing lure’ to drag the dog back. Dogs on a long leash cannot move the same way as a dog off-leash, and freedom from physical restrictions is wonderful for a dog’s mental and physical health and condition.
• Collars and Harnesses. Dogs that pull or lunge against any kind of harness or collar may feel pressure and tension on their neck, chest, armpits, stomach, and throat. Leash reactivity is often directly related to the built-in physical restrictions and tension of the leash and collar, a sensation that makes many dogs anxious and uncomfortable. On the flip side, a dog that is trained with gentle stim to recall or redirect is more likely able to enjoy off-leash freedom and outdoor exploration, activities which will always be more enriching and less stressful to most dogs than a restrictive walk on pavement.
• Squirt Bottle. Squirt bottles, like shock collars, teach dogs to fear the circumstances and may even teach them to fear water and being sprayed. Many dog owners rely on the squirt bottle as a threat and the dog never really learns right from wrong, which is aversive in and of itself. Unlike E-Collars, no positive association is ever made to being squirted in the face.
• Errorless Learning/Behavior Management. Management is an important and necessary part of dog training! However, when management is used as a supposed ‘positive’ alternative to communication (and yes, appropriate corrections), it may be inhumane and unfair. Read on…

ENDLESS RESTRICTIONS

The common response from trainers who wish to avoid any kind of stimulus that could be seen as aversive (including the E-Collar on a low level, used on a dog taught to associate the tingle with treats) will be to advocate for strict behavior management and a positive only approach.

Behavior management includes leashes, escape-proof harnesses, martingale collars, withholding access, gates and crates which can all be used to make sure that the dog cannot make a mistake (such as slipping a collar or jumping a fence).

These are all tools and techniques that can be aversive in and of themselves. 

Management is an important part of proper training, however, many overlook how aversive many management techniques can be for the dog.

Dogs need us to communicate with them, and that includes establishing boundaries and giving them the ‘full picture’ of the world they live in. Dogs that live restricted lives with no freedom to make mistakes can become confused and often become needlessly shut down, frantic, anxious, frustrated or reactive.

Isolating a dog from experiences in the name of the long haul ‘positive only/errorless learning’ approach may actually be inhumane and will almost definitely be more aversive to a dog than communication from an E-Collar paired with positive reinforcement.

Endless restrictions to freedom and experiences suck.

FIGARO, THE FENCE JUMPER

We have a friendly, confident, positively trained (clicker + treats) Great Dane with great recall and polite manners. He’s young, full of life, athletic and awesome. I BELIEVE in positive training!

One day he learned that he could get over the fence, into the neighbor’s yard to play with their terrier. The neighbor was NOT amused.

To address this, Figaro spent the next three weeks on a long leash in the yard while I taught him new fence boundaries and prevented the behavior. I used a clicker and taught him to redirect away from the fence and to ignore the neighbor’s dog. IT WORKED!

But the entire time my sweet Dane baby was heartbroken. He HATED being on a leash in the yard. He hunched his head, walked slowly, and wouldn’t stay outside with me for long. For most of the three weeks, he moped around the house. This was despite the fact that I did everything I could to make it positive and fun, and despite the fact that anywhere else in the world he was perfectly happy to be on a leash.

If all you’ve ever known was freedom to explore the backyard, how crappy would it be to suddenly have no freedom at all?

The long-haul positive approach rooted in strict management and behavior prevention ended up being aversive to him, and he’s not alone! 

I now know that a highly positive approach paired with conditioning to the E-Collar (so he could be off-leash while learning and have the stim available to redirect him if needed) would have been less aversive, faster, more humane, and more appropriate for him.

Do not buy into the marketing that tells you a long leash and strict management are better for a dog than an E-Collar! Modern technology and education is changing this narrative.

OH, BUT WHAT ABOUT THE STUDIES?

For every study out there claiming that shock collars and E-Collars are bad, there is another study claiming that they are perfectly acceptable.

These studies are often flawed. No distinction is made between a shock collar and the E-Collar (they often lump the two devices into the same, which is a massive fault in the origins of the study), and no practice is made of making sure the Electric collar trained dogs in the study had been properly and positively conditioned to the collar in the first place.

Most studies that indicate elevated stress levels associated with electronic collars were done on dogs where the ‘Easy button’ method was used, and training only took place over days or at best, weeks. 

In other words, the training method being ‘studied’ often involved asking a dog for a recall, offering very little positive reinforcement, requiring a lot of dogs in a short period of time and using the stim or shock to ‘punish’ them for not coming when called.

Of course that is going to elevate stress levels, especially in the context of the unusual environment of a study! The stim is not meant to be used as a punishment, and shock collars will never be an appropriate training tool. So comparing those studies to the way modern, positive trainers are using E-Collars isn’t fair.

The correct approach to E-Collar training a recall involves creating a positive association including happy, engaged body language to the stim (R+), developing a foundation in recall using treats and praise (R+), using a long leash to prevent errors, and then teaching the dog that stim + come = come back (R+, again).

Many E-Collar trainers then strengthen the recall by also teaching the dog that the feeling of the stim (marching ants) becomes weaker the closer the dog gets to the handler (making recall even MORE rewarding through a very gentle version of ‘negative reinforcement’ where the dog is completely in control of the stim, not the handler).

Is the stimulation annoying? At some levels, yes, it can be. But as above, so is a long leash. The difference here is that the E-Collar provides freedom and choice, while the long leash does not.

THINK OF IT LIKE A CLICKER, TREATS OR BRAIN GAMES.

E-collars do not have to be aversive, painful, or punishing. It is a huge mistake to use them that way.

We think there is space for E-Collars in the positive trainer’s toolbox, especially with the knowledge that the stim is less aversive to most dogs than many traditional techniques and tools. Many owners and trainers report that after just a few weeks of E-Collar conditioning, their dogs are happier, calmer, easier to live with, and much, much more confident! 

E-Collars can lead to more freedom; natural movement, unobstructed by collars and harnesses, and well-trained dogs that understand how to play the stim AND the treat game.

Communication, not corrections