In the wake of the social media frenzy about Purina Pro Plan, I was encouraged to create a pet food safety series (of which this is the first installment). The topic of this article is about euthanized animals in pet food, based on a comment that I’ve seen all too often being spread around on social media.
“Veterinarians and dog shelters sell euthanized animals to pet food companies. They are then ground up with their collars and everything, and put into pet food.”
A surprising number of people believe this gut-wrenching theory. Let’s dig in.
Are There Euthanized Animals in Pet Food?
Unlikely. This is not a widespread issue, nor are there any verifiable reports that this practice is done intentionally by any pet food company.
But as always, there is more to this story.
The theory about euthanized pets in dog and cat food has circulated on the internet from day one. In all fairness, some variation of this scenario has occurred.
Pentobarbital is a drug frequently used to euthanize animals, including pets.
A handful of pet food companies have faced issues involving recalls and FDA scrutiny due to the discovery of Pentobarbital in their products. It all started in late 2016 when one pet died and a few others became sick after eating Evanger’s canned food.
As a result of this, tests were done on more than a dozen pet food brands. The euthanasia drug was found in 9 out of 15 cans of Gravy Train.
Recalls were issued, and a media frenzy on this topic began.
The source of Pentobarbital in Gravy Train was determined to be beef fat, purchased from the JBS Souderton Inc. meat processing facility in Souderton, PA.
JBS had also supplied beef tallow Champion Pet Foods (Acana/Orijen Brand), and despite the potential presence of contaminated beef fat in their product, the company opted not to issue a recall.
Substantial inquiries arise regarding the circumstances surrounding this occurrence, the actions taken to address it, and the measures implemented to prevent its recurrence in the future.
Can Pet Food Companies Use Euthanized Animals?
Reputable pet food companies steer clear of this practice by meticulously selecting ingredients and enforcing rigorous quality control measures to detect any adulterated or contaminated products throughout the entire production process, from sourcing to final inspection.
There is a growing demand for clearer labeling and higher standards in the pet food industry.
It’s important to acknowledge that the majority of pet food companies prioritize the creation of a safe and nutritious product.
Their emphasis on these aspects is driven by the understanding that without a strong focus on safety and nutrition, consumers would likely refrain from purchasing their products, resulting in a loss of revenue for the companies.
Pentobarbital can potentially end up in pet food through various avenues, including the presence of euthanized animals in the rendering process, which is the process of converting animal tissues into usable materials like fats and proteins for various industries (including pet food).
If euthanized animals are not properly segregated from the rendering process, residues of pentobarbital from euthanasia drugs may remain in the rendered material and subsequently contaminate the pet food.
JBS Souderton Inc., the provider of the contaminated beef tallow used in various questionable pet food brands (Including Kibbles & Bits, Orijen/Acana, and Evanger’s), faced scrutiny from the FDA.
A warning letter to JBS Souderton dated April 23rd, 20193, reveals that repeated inspections of the processing plant uncovered numerous instances of cleanliness, sanitation, and sourcing violations, along with the discovery of Pentobarbital in product tanks at the facility.
While JBS Souderton bears initial responsibility, the pet food companies that incorporated the contaminated beef tallow into their products also have significant accountability to address.
Pet Food Myth: Shelter Animals in Pet Food
The above information has led many people to conclude that all pet foods contain euthanized, ground-up shelter pets.
To put this bluntly, that is a big stretch. There is no truth, let alone verifiable proof, of this claim.
We can substantiate past issues with Pentobarbital in pet food, particularly among brands sourcing beef tallow from JBS Souderton.
Beyond the brands that had Pentobarbital in their pet foods, any further claims remain speculative.
Of course, sensationalism SELLS.
The idea of using ground-up shelter animals in pet food is provocative, controversial, and deeply concerning to pet parents who prioritize the well-being and quality of nutrition for their beloved pets.
It is also a broad, sweeping generalization that has caused needless and untold amounts of fear and anxiety for pet parents.
How To Find a Pet Food With Good Quality Control
The trick to this is not to avoid commercially prepared pet foods. It’s to learn how to choose brands that are transparent, ethical, and have good quality control practices.
It doesn’t matter how nice, holistic, or organic the marketing of that brand is; they are still subject to making mistakes and engaging in questionable sourcing and testing practices.
To find a pet food with excellent quality control, consider the following steps:
Research reputable brands: Look for pet food companies with a strong reputation for transparency, quality ingredients, and rigorous quality control measures. Your veterinarian is a good place to start, as they often communicate directly with certain pet food companies and have insider information about their plants, quality, sourcing, and nutrition science. Here is a great example of a brand with exceptional attention to quality control5, where they indicate that over 1000 lab analyses are done every day during all stages of production.
Check for certifications & guidelines: Seek out pet foods that adhere to regulatory guidelines such as those set by the Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO).
Look for quality control information: Check the manufacturer’s website or contact customer support to inquire about their specific quality control processes, including testing for contaminants and adherence to safety standards. Exceptional pet food companies are testing at all stages of production, and maintain batch samples for some time after the food is distributed.
Ask who formulates the food: companies that have several highly qualified nutritionists, food scientists, and veterinarians on staff are much more likely to produce food that is safe, nutritious, and bioavailable.
This is a big jump. No, your neighbor’s dog, your local shelter animal, and some dogs from a hoarding situation down the street are NOT in your pet’s food!
It is neither honest nor ethical to suggest that all brands incorporate ground-up euthanized animals due to the actions of a few companies that sourced low-quality ingredients.
Has euthanasia drug been found in pet food? Yes.
Have ground-up pets and collars been found in pet food? Not that I’ve seen, anywhere.
Is this a widespread problem? No.
Is Pentobarbital in pet food likely to harm your pet? No, because even if it does end up in the food, it is likely to be in very low and nearly untraceable amounts. While this doesn’t justify its presence, it does make the likelihood of harm extremely improbable.
Each year, 300-400 new pet food brands enter the market, attempting to compete alongside a small group of popular legacy brands with established practices.
The tiny handful of questionable brands that were caught with contaminated ingredients do not accurately represent the vast majority of pet food options available.
My opinion? When it comes to pet food safety, there are bigger fish to fry.
What do you think? Leave your comments below! Discussion is welcome and encouraged.
In the world of puppy care, the practice of giving vitamin C to treat knuckling or carpal laxity has been a long-standing tradition. However, some veterinary journals suggest that this practice may be outdated and potentially harmful. This article aims to provide a thorough examination of the history, pros and cons, dosing information, and recommendations for pet owners considering vitamin C supplementation for their puppies.
This blog is especially important for those who own large or giant breed puppies such as Great Danes, as they are particularly susceptible to growth disorders affecting their orthopedic structure for life!
In this blog we will discuss:
Vitamin C as a treatment for puppy knuckling
The health benefits of Vitamin C for puppies
New research on bone health and optimal nutrition
The cons of giving Vitamin C to puppies
Which form of Vitamin C to choose, if you use it
Vitamin C dosing for Puppies
Are Vitamin C Supplements Beneficial for Puppies?
A quick Google search turns up countless blog posts on this topic, but few answers are backed by legitimate science and research.
The tradition of administering vitamin C to puppies stems from a belief in its potential benefits for joint health, particularly in large and giant breeds. Vitamin C plays a key role in collagen production and may play a supportive role in joint health. Proponents also believe that it can boost the immune system and act as an anti-inflammatory.
To further understand if that is beneficial, it’s helpful to know how Vitamin C works for dogs in the first place.
Dogs synthesize Vitamin C in their liver, all on their own, creating around 18mg of Vitamin C for every pound of their body weight.
In other words, it is extremely unlikely for a dog to be deficient in Vitamin C, because they make it themselves.
Can Dogs Get Scurvy?
Scurvy is a condition caused by a deficiency of Vitamin C, which plagued pirates and travelers who spent extended periods at sea without access to fresh fruits and vegetables.
The link between citrus fruits and scurvy prevention in humans was discovered in the 18th century by James Lind, a Scottish naval surgeon.
While it’s theoretically possible for dogs to experience scurvy, the likelihood is exceedingly low, thanks to their natural ability to produce vitamin C without relying on dietary supplements. In this way, dogs and cats differ from humans!
If a dog is suffering from symptoms that mimic or could be scurvy, veterinary diagnostics are needed to sort out the root cause of the deficiency.
Carpal Laxity Knuckling and Vitamin C Supplementation
Many pet owners administer vitamin C to their puppies with the belief, rooted in the practices of breeders and fellow pet owners, that it can prevent or even address the issue of puppies knuckling over.
Carpal Laxity, commonly known as “knuckling over,” occurs when a puppy undergoes rapid growth that outpaces the development of muscles, ligaments, and tendons. Consequently, the feet may either knuckle over or lose support at the ankle and toe joints and fall flat.
This condition is understandably alarming to pet parents! It can also be common, especially among young large and giant breed dogs during their explosive growth stages.
Breeders and enthusiasts frequently recommend Vitamin C as a preventive or treatment measure for this condition. However, the question remains: is this practice genuinely beneficial, or is it rooted in anecdotal beliefs?
I’m not convinced it’s something we should be doing for every dog. It may be a harmful practice! Let’s dive into this.
The Dangers of Over-Supplementation in Pet Diets
Excessive supplementation in pet diets poses significant risks to the health and well-being of our furry companions.
While certain vitamins and minerals are essential for their proper growth and development, an overdose can lead to adverse effects. Over-supplementation, whether intentional or unintentional, may result in toxicity, causing symptoms ranging from digestive issues to more severe complications such as organ damage.
While some argue that over-supplementation merely leads to “expensive pee,” the reality is that at times it can translate to costly veterinary bills.
For example, there is a reason that excess vitamin D in pet food has resulted in multiple recalls from pet food companies (including Hill’s, Fromm, Simply Nourish, and others).Excess vitamin D is toxic to dogs.
Just because something is “natural” and sounds healthy, doesn’t mean that it is.
Is Too Much Vitamin C Toxic For Dogs?
Vitamin C does act as an ANTI-oxidant. Antioxidants prevent cell damage, and that’s a wonderful benefit.
However, according to the veterinarians at Tufts University, excess Vitamin C (too much of it) will have the opposite effect.
When given in large amounts, Vitamin C can become a PRO-oxidant! Instead of fighting oxidation, it begins to promote oxidation and thus, lead to cell damage.
What I’m trying to get at here is that the blind practice of giving large and giant breed puppies Vitamin C as a “preventative” may be misguided and worse, damaging.
Of course, one data point on this topic isn’t enough. I want to see the research! So I dug some more.
Cons of Vitamin C for Puppies Joint Health
In my research, I found four additional problems with giving puppies high levels of vitamin C!
Calcium Oxalate Stones
When the body has an abundance of vitamin C, it metabolizes into oxalate, a compound that, when combined with calcium, can lead to the development of these stones in the urinary tract.
Calcium Oxalate Stones pose a serious health concern for dogs, as they can obstruct urinary passages, causing discomfort, pain, and potential complications.
Chronic Loose Stools & Digestive Upset
When provided more than their body needs, abundant vitamin C can irritate the gastrointestinal tract, leading to symptoms such as diarrhea, stomach discomfort, or vomiting.
Advocates for providing puppies with high levels of vitamin C often suggest resolving potential digestive issues by dividing the dose across multiple meals. Yet, considering the inherent sensitivity of puppy stomachs and the prevalence of chronic digestive problems in many young pups, one may question the wisdom of this practice.
A lot of pet owners modify their puppies’ diet and incorporate various home remedies into their food to address persistent loose stools and stomach upset. In many of these cases, the culprit behind these issues might have been Vitamin C.
Excess Calcium in the Blood
Here is where things become sticky. Science tells us, without question, that excess calcium is damaging to puppies’ bones and joints as they grow. Calcium is an incredibly important mineral that is necessary for bone growth and health, but too much is devastating.
Large and giant breed puppies should receive no more than 3.5g per 1000 kCal of calcium in their diet. For most foods, that means the calcium needs to be at 1.2% or less, with phosphorus closely matched.
Studies have shown that puppies with an excess of calcium in their bloodstream are highly prone to developing profoundly abnormal joints as they grow.
One study showed that giving Ascorbic Acid to puppies that were suffering from HOD (hypertrophic osteodystrophy) correlated with an increase in their calcium levels.
For puppies already experiencing the effects of over-nutrition and high calcium from their diet, vitamin C made it worse.
Overnutrition and Rapid Growth
Rapid growth and hasty bone modeling are significant indicators of potential orthopedic issues in large and giant breed puppies. The long-term effects of their puppy diet become evident, particularly in adulthood.
It’s logical to assume that doubling or even tripling the quantity of a specific nutrient in the diet can lead to issues. The intricate process of tissue, bone, cartilage, and tendon creation is highly susceptible to negative influences when the body receives improper nutrition.
Amino acids, vitamins, and minerals all play pivotal roles in the functions of growth, bone mineralization, and modeling. What’s more, they all work together. Some cannot function without the other.
Excessive amounts of any of these key elements may have adverse effects, no matter how ‘nice’ and ‘harmless’ a simple nutrient (such as vitamin C) may sound.
Do Puppies Excrete Excess Vitamin C?
Faced with this information, many individuals argue that animals, including humans, will excrete the excess Vitamin C through urine, suggesting that over-supplementation poses no problem.
The belief here is often guided by the notion of “no harm, no foul.” This notion is often reinforced by the anecdotal favorite response of “Well, my dogs were given this, and they are perfectly fine.“
While it’s true that some portion of the excess is eliminated through urine, particularly for vitamins with low bioavailability that won’t be effectively absorbed or utilized, we must acknowledge that over-supplementation has been proven to cause certain conditions.
This raises the question of “when is it too much?”
Irrespective of the dosage, there are established conditions linked to the excessive intake of vitamins, even those considered “safe”, like vitamin C.
Every pet owner should conduct a risk-benefit analysis to ensure informed decision-making.
If over-dosing could easily lead to cell damage, urinary stones, and an excess of calcium in the blood, it raises questions about whether Vitamin C is as beneficial a supplement as it was once believed to be.
Does Vitamin C Prevent Hip Dysplasia in Dogs?
The role of Vitamin C in preventing hip dysplasia in dogs is not conclusively supported by scientific evidence.
I’m sorry to say, but it just isn’t. There are thousands upon thousands of veterinary studies, journals, and research out there and there isn’t anything supporting the use of Vitamin C as a preventative for hip dysplasia or any other bone growth disorder.
Genetic factors, nutrition, and proper care play crucial roles in hip dysplasia prevention.
Similar to most bone growth disorders such as Panosteitis, knuckling over, HOD, Retained Cartilage Cores, etc., the development of these conditions is frequently influenced by excess calcium and over-nutrition.
Hip dysplasia is genetically linked, and dogs with a predisposition are potentially at an even greater risk when exposed to preventable environmental factors.
In my research on Vitamin C supplements for puppies, I’ve discovered that providing excessive amounts may have adverse effects. Puppies given an excess of vitamin C may experience elevated levels of calcium, which can be detrimental. Read more from the Vet Chick, HERE.
Does Vitamin C Prevent or Treat Knuckling Over in Puppies?
If you’ve made it this far into my article here, you probably realize what I am going to say.
Chances are, no.
Observations regarding the potential effects of Vitamin C treatment on puppy knuckling are anecdotal and rooted in correlation rather than established causation.
For example, if a puppy never experiences a growth problem (such as carpal laxity), a pet owner or breeder may believe that the supplementation of Vitamin C has played a role in its prevention.
In a different example, a puppy exhibiting knuckling over may have shown rapid improvement upon the addition of vitamin C to its diet. It would be easy to believe that Vitamin C had resulted in the improvement.
However, other contributing factors such as alterations in the diet fed, reduced overall stress levels, a better feeding routine, the puppy maturing out of it naturally, and improved practices in caring for the puppy’s joints, likely played a role in the observed recovery.
Considering that a genuine diagnosis of scurvy is highly improbable for dogs, it becomes evident that vitamin C deficiency is not the root cause of the symptoms. If it’s not the underlying cause, the question arises: why is it being employed as a preventative or treatment?
Are There Benefits to Giving Vitamin C to Puppies?
There can be some benefits to vitamin C supplementation, yes!
It is well understood that while dogs make their vitamin C in their livers, their reserves of it may be depleted by stressful events such as extreme exercise (sled dogs and greyhound racing, for example), changes in the home environment (new home, leaving the litter), and medical procedures (including ear cropping).
Nevertheless, since the advantages of supplementing in these scenarios lack conclusive evidence, such practices may serve little more than to provide a sense of reassurance for the pet parent.
It’s important to highlight one study that found giving racing greyhounds vitamin C had the opposite effect as desired. It slowed them down!
For me, the combination of a lack of scientific proof, paired with numerous data points showing the potential problems, makes me question the practice of giving puppies Vitamin C supplements.
With an appropriate diet and adequate care at home or in a veterinary environment, dogs can effectively replenish their depleted vitamin C levels on their own.
Does Vitamin C Prevent Cancer in Dogs
Some research has shown that vitamin C may have a positive effect on cancer prevention and outcomes. However, this has not yet become well understood, nor has it been well replicated in human (or dog) models.
Many researchers speculate, based on their studies, that the role of Vitamin C in cancer prevention will ultimately be disappointing. In other words, it is unlikely to be more beneficial and less harmful than other therapies and treatments.
Practitioners in alternative medicine frequently advocate for the use of vitamins, including Vitamin C, in preventing health conditions, despite limited evidence supporting their effectiveness. It’s not uncommon for them to position things like Vitamin C as a magical cure-all with numerous benefits.
This creates a challenge in distinguishing between factual information and speculation, as opinions within this field often diverge and contradict each other.
While Vitamin C may have some potential benefits in cancer prevention, it’s important to recognize that it’s unlikely to be a miraculous cure-all.
What is the Best Form of Vitamin C to Give Puppies?
The best form of Vitamin C for puppies is a nutritious diet.
If you want to provide nutritious foods that contain vitamin C, consider offering fresh, whole foods as a boost instead of commercially available Vitamin C supplements. Adding fresh foods to the diet can have other benefits, too, such as increasing fiber intake and reducing the risk of bloat.
Some examples of dog-safe foods that contain vitamin C include:
Remember to keep healthy toppers like this to less than 10% of the diet, or less than 5% of the diet if under the age of 8-12 months.
This is important because your pet needs balanced nutrition to support their overall health; too many extras can cause problems with the intake of other important nutrients, amino acids, and minerals.
Final Verdict – Is Vitamin C Beneficial?
I don’t think it’s the most harmful practice, but I’m not convinced it’s necessary or truly helpful, either.
Having now read some of the actual research in-depth myself, I will not be giving Vitamin C supplements to future puppies. Many veterinarians would agree with me; a lot of them consider this practice outdated and without merit.
Millions of people have given their big pups up to 1500mg/day of Vitamin C and seem to have suffered no ill effects. However, how can we know for sure? We don’t, and that mystery is what gives me pause.
Depending on the pup’s current weight at dosing, 1500mg can be 2-4x what their body produces, and needs, naturally.
The form of Vitamin C used can affect how much is used in the body, too. Esther C is commonly seen as the most bioavailable form; however, it includes calcium. We know unnecessary and additional calcium in the diet is damaging.
In assessing all of that, I’ve come to realize that it may just not be worth the money or the potential risk. We have no legitimate or scientific proof that Vitamin C supplements do much at all to help with certain conditions (such as knuckling over and dysplasia) and plenty of proof that it may be harmful.
Do you believe that large and giant breed puppies should always receive vitamin C supplementation in their diet? Leave a comment below!
We wanted to give you an update on Purina heavy metals test results, because the verdict is in!
Numerous pet owners are worried about giving Purina pet food to their animals, citing concerns about potential toxins in the food. The concerns began in 2023 with a toxicology screening report from Kansas State University, which showed potentially elevated levels of certain metals in Purina Pro Plan Sensitive Skin & Stomach food.
Both Purina and the FDA have looked into this issue. The food was retested at two different labs.
FACT CHECK: Repeated testing found that Purina foods are safe to feed. The initial test results were incorrect, due to an error that occured during testing.
Update: March 6th, 2024
After the first round of pet food samples Dr. Morgan sent for testing came back clean (January), she implored pet owners to submit kibble food samples from their homes.
She sent these samples to the lab, and the food returned clean once again.
This information was buried in a 14-minute video posted to her YouTube and Facebook channels on March 6th. Dr. Morgan has spent thousands of dollars trying to prove that something is “seriously wrong” with the food and continues to turn up empty-handed.
To deflect from these test results, her video contains nearly 15 minutes of speculation and misleading information, including:
Conspiracies about other sites “scrubbing” information
Pet stores and brands dumping food by the truckload (which has always happened for various reasons; this is not new)
Pet brands are offering discounts and coupons (she believes that they are desperate to give the food away)
Speculation that the food contains “pesticides,” which are supposedly what’s causing the problem, and continued testing is needed
Statements about a widespread problem of pet food containing bugs, spiders, and spider webs (apparently, this is happening despite the supposed use of ‘pesticides,’ which is hugely contradictory to her argument)
She spends a lot of time discussing her theory that the food contains pesticides and believes that they haven’t found a lab willing to find the contaminant.
None of the foods tested positive, but she believes they haven’t yet found the right contaminant to test for.
A few moments later, she blames the lack of verified reports from pet owners on veterinarians not testing the stomach contents of the dogs who died (during an autopsy).
This is also contradictory because if the food comes up clean in lab reports, the stomach contents would also come up clean. It’s not like the stomach contents magically reveal the supposed contamination when the food seems to have nothing wrong with it.
Statements like this are deliberate and meant to mislead pet owners into continuing to believe there is a problem despite the complete lack of evidence.
Dr. Morgan is now imploring people to send her photos and videos of pet food in dumpsters. This is precisely the kind of conspiracy fodder needed to perpetuate this ongoing “kibble fiasco” and does little more than keep worried (and susceptible) pet owners busy.
At the same time, she continues to drag this out.
Update: January 30th, 2024
Two independent lab results from Purina came back clean, and the tests that Dr. Judy Morgan sent also came back clean.
She spent around $4000 to have lab tests done on Purina Pet food. In a video on her Facebook page on January 30th, she mentioned that they did not find heavy metals, Aflatoxins, Pentobarbital, Melamine, Vitamin D, Clostridium, Listeria, or Salmonella.
I will discuss this further, but the key point is that Purina does not contain harmful levels of heavy metals. Any contrary information you encounter is rooted in online rumors and a social media campaign leveraging fear-based marketing to promote “holistic” alternatives.
Kansas State University KSU Heavy Metals Report on Purina Food
In November 2023, a post gained viral traction on social media, suggesting three dogs fell seriously ill after consuming Pro Plan Sensitive dog food. The post showcased a portion of a document containing toxicology results from the Kansas State University laboratory.
The report highlighted heightened levels of specific heavy metals, leading to understandable concern among pet parents.
Numerous individuals questioned the reliability of the report. Purina is renowned for maintaining an extensive quality control and testing program. The notion that they would distribute food with toxic levels of heavy metals to store shelves appeared far-fetched.
Furthermore, the report lacked crucial details, including the specific Purina formula tested (such as the lot/batch number), and reference numbers or information providing context on what an average value might typically be for similar foods.
Despite the red flags, the holistic pet community grabbed hold of this and started spreading it around as “proof” that Purina pet foods are dangerous to feed. That is another discussion, which I cover in depth in another blog post titled “Is Purina Dog Food Making Dogs Sick”. You can read it here!
Heavy Metals Analysis Testing Error
An update was released on January 15th, 2024. Purina published that the samples were tested again by Kansas State University AND Iowa State University’s Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory.
The results of both tests confirmed that there had been a testing error in the initial heavy metals analysis for Purina Pro Plan Sensitive Skin & Stomach.
Purina pet foods are, in fact, safe to feed.
Occasional failures occur in all laboratories. Contamination, storage and processing errors and equipment malfunctions can contribute to issues that skew test results. This underscores the importance of repeating critical tests and screenings to ensure accuracy.
Unfortunately, this now-debunked toxicology screening has caused untold amounts of anxiety and panic among pet parents! Some people are still spreading the initial report as fact, which is misguided, misleading, and disingenuous.
Purina’s Response to Online Rumors
Purina says that as few as two consumer reports associated with any food or product will prompt them to investigate. Due to the viral spread of the heavy metal screening test result on social media, hundreds of reports related to various products in their line were generated.
In light of this rumor, our Quality Assurance team has reviewed all incoming consumer contacts, manufacturing, and quality assurance data (this includes ingredient testing, analytical data throughout the production process, and quality assurance post-production testing) for the past year.
To clarify, Purina did treat this matter seriously. As numerous pet owners seek explanations for their pets’ illnesses and fatalities, it’s crucial to recognize that pets can fall ill irrespective of the food they consume.
There is no concrete evidence suggesting that Purina has caused harm to any dogs. Social media reports seem to stem from individuals who neglected veterinary consultation, disregarded diagnosed conditions (such as Parvo, unrelated to pet food), or attributed every ailment, from obstructions to poisoning and genetic disorders, to Purina.
The media team at Purina has responded swiftly to all reports and has published a page with information about the online rumors. You can read it HERE.
Is There a Silent Recall of Purina Food?
Despite proof from multiple University labs that Purina Pro Plan pet food is safe to feed, anxious pet parents and social influencers continue to promote the idea that a recall is imminent.
Purina has consistently addressed this issue through multiple statements on its social media platforms and website. However, some individuals are reluctant to accept these explanations.
Individuals who suspect that Purina is concealing information promote the notion that the company is engaging in a “silent recall.” Their theory is that Purina is quietly pulling food from store shelves but is not publishing a recall with the FDA.
Of course, this is a theory with no basis or proof. It’s important to emphasize that a “silent recall” is purely speculative and lacks substantiated basis or evidence.
Purina remains readily available for purchase from major retailers like Chewy. If it is unavailable in a particular pet store, it’s more likely due to a stock issue than a recall.
There is no such thing as a ‘silent recall,’ and quietly retracting product from the market that has been proven to be harmful to pets would be both irresponsible and illegal. Information about any recall is shared immediately with the FDA, consumers, retailers and veterinarians.
Unless the FDA publishes an official recall, there is little (if any) reason to be concerned.
Purina Heavy Metals Test Results from Dr. Morgan
Dr. Judy Morgan, a prominent holistic influencer leading the anti-Purina campaign, purportedly sent samples of Purina pet food to independent labs for testing.
There is no information available regarding how she acquired, stored, or handled the samples, and it’s unclear whether they originated from the homes of pet parents who allege that the food harmed their pets.
Despite several weeks passing, those results are still pending. While she attributes the delay to the time-consuming nature of the process, questions arise as Purina has already disclosed the outcomes of their comprehensive tests.
The whereabouts of Dr. Morgan’s test results remain uncertain; despite this, she continues to promote that the food is full of toxins.
Author’s Note: I am actively monitoring this social activity and the dissemination of misinformation by Dr. Morgan and her followers. Should she present test results, I will assess their validity and provide an update here.
Is Purina a Trustworthy Company?
Ultimately, pet parents have a choice in deciding whom to trust.
The credibility lies with thousands of practicing veterinarians, board-certified Veterinary Nutritionists, and consistent test results from various laboratories. It’s worth noting that 46 million dogs are fed Purina each year and lead long, joyful, and healthy lives.
On the other hand, there exists an opposing viewpoint promoted by “holistic” veterinarians who often engage in fear-based marketing tactics. This perspective advocates the belief that extensively researched foods like Purina are detrimental to pets’ health and contain toxins.
Followers of this viewpoint have been urged to discredit conventional veterinarians and be skeptical of preventive measures such as teeth cleaning, vaccines, and flea/tick medications.
They leverage this information to promote online courses, books, and alternative foods and supplements (which conveniently, they sell).
We see this at play in multiple very concerning Facebook groups, which are run or moderated by Dr. Morgan. A lot of easily debunked misinformation is being spread, along with a healthy handful of promotions and brand recommendations (including products that she either owns or has a strong financial affiliation with).
I think the choice of who to trust is clear as day. I stand with science, evidence, and critical thinking. My dogs eat Purina Pro Plan and are thriving; the proof is in the pudding.
Notably, with few exceptions, most other social media groups on Facebook are now restricting discussions related to the current “Purina Panic.” This indicates a substantial number of moderators in the pet community actively curbing the spread of misinformation, and we appreciate that!
Share your perspective! Do you trust Purina, or do you suspect that Purina food may have affected your pet? Feel free to leave a thoughtful comment below. If you align with our scientific approach, please share this post, too!
Amid the current concerns surrounding pet nutrition, there’s a growing unease among pet owners regarding the conventional recommendations from veterinarians. Royal Canin, Hill’s Science Diet, and Purina stand out as the top three brands frequently endorsed by vets – and for valid reasons. However, there’s a notable confusion among pet owners about why vets recommend Royal Canin, as some find the ingredients questionable.
Whether we want to believe it or not, Royal Canin stands out as one of the cleanest and most biologically suitable pet foods. However, many people find the ingredients list confusing and in conflict with what they believe to be correct.
So let’s dig into this. Here are a few topics I’ll cover below!
The truth about Royal Canin ingredients & sourcing
The reason why veterinarians sell Royal Canin food in their office
The quality control and science behind Royal Canin pet food
Whether or not veterinarians receive kickbacks or incentives for learning about and promoting Royal Canin food to their clients
The reasons why Veterinarians recommend foods like Royal Canin, instead of fresh, raw, or “higher quality” kibbles
Are Royal Canin Ingredients Bad?
Many people promote that Royal Canin food is made up of “absolute trash”.
The first two ingredients in MANY Royal Canin formulas are:
Chicken By-Product Meal
Corn
To the uneducated pet owner, it’s understandable that those ingredients seem not only alarming but cheap! This is especially true when pet owners are presented with this information by those that they consider to hold a position of expertise (such as their dog trainer or an employee at a pet store).
How can Royal Canin justify its luxury price point with those ingredients?
The answer is simple. Those ingredients aren’t bad. The ingredients in Royal Canin pet food result in a nutritious, bioavailable dry diet that has been proven time and time again.
Hear me out. I know what you have heard AND what you are thinking!
“By-products in pet food are bad!” “Corn is a filler!”
I’m going to debunk those myths below, but before we get there, let’s start with information sourcing!
The Truth About “Canine Nutritionists”
Where did you hear those things from? Did you hear them from a board-certified Veterinary Nutritionist?Or did you hear them from an influencer, blogger, or “canine nutritionist”?
It’s important to note that “Canine Nutritionist” (and titles similar to it) are made up. The only nutritionist with legitimate credentials will have a board certification in Veterinary nutrition, and/or a PhD in Animal Nutrition. Most other “nutritionists” have little more than a simple online course under their belt.
Social media is littered with people who have claimed the title of “nutritionist” and share it as a matter of authority. In many cases, they are using their authority to promote “holistic” and “natural” foods through brand deals and affiliate links.
These very same people who say that “veterinarians don’t learn much about nutrition” are ironically the same ones whose credentials often consist of nothing more than a $10 online course that took a weekend to complete.
We must be critical of those who obtain these “pet nutrition expert” type titles, as many times they are simply regurgitating what they’ve been taught by other profit-driven influencers such as Dr. Judy Morgan.
Ingredients in Royal Canin Pet Food
As mentioned above, the ingredients in Royal Canin pet food are often looked at with scrutiny by those who promote the idea of “natural” diets for dogs.
The two controversial ingredients in Royal Canin and many other veterinary-recommended dog food brands are corn and by-products.
Let’s break this down!
Chicken By-Product Meal
By-products in pet food are often misunderstood, but they can contribute valuable species-appropriate nutrients, proteins, and amino acids.
It’s a complete myth that by-products are ground-up waste from the slaughterhouse floor, or that they contain roadkill, euthanized pets, and diseased animals. The people who spread misinformation like this are nearly always trying to promote or sell a different product or agenda.
In the U.S. alone, we process billions of chickens for human consumption. Every single one comes with nutritious organs, cartilage, fat, and bone that would go to waste if they weren’t used in pet food.
When these chicken parts are used in dog food, they are a natural source of nutrients such as calcium, phosphorus, Iron, B-12, Folate, Selenium, Choline, and more. Avoiding the use of by-products in pet food formulations may mean the company must make up nutritional deficiencies in the formula with additional synthetic vitamins.
Not that there is anything inherently wrong with vitamins and minerals being added to the diet, but it does feel good to know that so many vitamins, minerals, and amino acids in our pet’s Royal Canin food may be coming from natural ingredients (whole chicken) rather than powders.
Just because “by-products” sounds bad, doesn’t mean that it is! But if you are still on the fence, I’ll leave you with this, too: if you’ve ever given your dog glucosamine, chicken paws, trachea, liver treats, raw food, bones of any kind, pig ears or bully sticks, you’ve given your pet by-products.
Enough said. Stop worrying about by-products in pet food, especially when it’s seen in veterinary-recommended brands.
Corn in Pet Food
Many people consider corn to be a filler in pet food, but have no clue why they feel that way. While it may seem counter-intuitive to feed corn to an animal that should have a lot of meat, consider this!
Corn is more digestible than beef. It also has a similar amino acid profile, making it a great source of necessary nutrients.
All dry kibble diets require some kind of starch to bind the meat products together. Many people are surprised to learn that corn may be a superior choice to other grains and legumes! It’s not a filler, and also not something to be afraid of.
Not only can corn be a source of certain amino acids, it provides energy and fiber.
In Royal Canin foods where chicken by-product meal and corn often make up the first 2 ingredients, we can be almost positive that the majority of the nutrition in the formula comes from those two things. That’s phenomenal.
Even if you don’t buy into the concept that chicken by-product meal and corn are nutritious, bioavailable ingredients in pet food, you have to admit that as a company Royal Canin is incredible.
Curious about why? Here are some stats:
The ROYAL CANIN® brand has pledged to achieve carbon neutrality certification by the conclusion of 2025. The initial product range is set to attain carbon-neutral certification by 2023, showcasing the brand’s dedicated efforts towards environmental sustainability.
Ongoing laboratory testing at every stage of production ensures product cleanliness and safety
500,000 lab analyses are done every year by the Royal Canin team. That’s 1400 tests done every day.
Suppliers and distributors must meet stringent quality protocols that meet their standards
A sample of every raw material brought to the factory is kept for 2 years. This means that every bag purchased is fully traceable back to the source for at least the duration of its shelf life.
The Royal Canin Foundation provides financial and organizational backing to projects worldwide, amplifying the positive impact that pets have on human health and well-being. These initiatives focus on three primary areas: enhancing the health and well-being of working dogs, and supporting pets that contribute to both human health and medical well-being
All of Royal Canin’s products are not crafted based on trends in human nutrition or the preferences of pet owners. Instead, they are meticulously researched and developed using innovative nutritional science and observations of cats and dogs.
Veterinarians recommend Royal Canin Foods because the company has a proven track record of providing safe, nutritious, and highly researched foods to pet owners.
We haven’t even touched yet on the millions of dollars that Royal Canin has poured into nutrition and pet health research. They recently developed a simple, non-invasive test that cat owners can use to detect blood in their pet’s urine, helping owners detect health problems in their cats sooner than ever before.
The put this simply, Royal Canin is often vilified by people who lack credentials in pet nutrition because doing so allows them to sell products that are, to put this bluntly, inferior.
Because no matter how good it may feel to purchase that “holistic” pet food with “good ingredients”, the fact is that those companies, and those foods, simply don’t compare. Many of them are mass-produced in huge factories that make hundreds of other brands, for example.
Veterinarians recommend Royal Canin because it’s a well-formulated food with traceable sourcing that works.
Human Diet Trends & Pet Food
Royal Canin has said many times that they refuse to give in to human diet trends to sell food.
Human diet trends are part of toxic diet culture; it’s part woo-woo, part marketing, and 100% predatory.
Despite this, pet food brands capitalized on the trend, introducing dog foods aiming to induce a state of Ketosis. Similarly, the grain-free trend in human diets influenced pet foods, and brands flooded the market with grain-free options.
Social media is inundated with brands and influencers promoting supposedly healthier and more natural pet foods, yet many of these influencers don’t feed these products to their pets.
It’s a marketing strategy more than a genuine commitment to pet health.
In this landscape, Royal Canin takes a firm stand against such trends. The brand prioritizes science and published research over fleeting consumer trends.
Author’s Note: It’s important to note that this stance does not apply to those with medical conditions or allergies treated with specific diets under the supervision of qualified nutritionists or doctors.
Do Veterinarians Receive Kickbacks for Promoting Royal Canin?
The notion of veterinarians receiving kickbacks for promoting specific pet food brands, such as Royal Canin, is a pervasive and damaging myth.
Veterinarians play a crucial role in promoting pet health and often recommend therapeutic pet food diets tailored to address specific medical conditions. Royal Canin, a well-established brand in the veterinary field, offers a range of therapeutic diets formulated to support various health needs in pets.
If a veterinarian recommends or prescribes Royal Canin foods, there is a reason! For example, Royal Canin makes diets that are safe and helpful for a range of conditions where proper nutrition is of key importance.
Some examples of therapeutic diets a veterinarian might recommend include:
Weight loss
Hydrolyzed protein (for dogs with severe allergies)
Liver, kidney, or Urinary care
Gastrointestinal
Vegetarian
Veterinarians base their suggestions on scientific research, nutritional expertise, and the specific dietary requirements of individual pets. The major companies that formulate therapeutic diets (Purina, Hill’s, and Royal Canin) have a team of board-certified Veterinary Nutritionists on staff who are available for veterinarians to call on if advice is needed before making a recommendation.
No other food brands offer this incredible access to experts with nearly 15 years of upper-level education in the field of animal biology and nutrition.
Many uneducated consumers may be incorrectly led to believe that these specialty diets are purely marketing; however, this assumption fails to acknowledge the role of nutrition in treating specific diseases, and the amount of research that has gone into each formula.
The notion of kickbacks in the veterinary profession is not only unfounded but also damaging to the trust between pet owners and veterinarians. Veterinarians adhere to ethical standards that prioritize the health of their patients above all else. Accusations of kickbacks undermine the integrity of the veterinary profession and can erode the confidence that pet owners place in their veterinarians’ recommendations.
Why Do Veterinarians Recommend Royal Canin Instead of Fresh Diets?
While fresh diets have gained popularity among some pet owners, veterinarians often advocate for commercially formulated diets.
This may confuse individuals who hold the mistaken belief that dry pet foods are excessively processed or harmful and that opting for fresh or raw foods is a panacea for all health issues.
Commercially available pet foods, including those from reputable brands like Royal Canin, undergo rigorous testing and quality control measures to ensure nutritional balance and safety. These formulations are meticulously crafted to meet the specific dietary needs of different life stages, breeds, and health conditions. The consistency and reliability of these commercial diets provide a level of assurance that can be challenging to replicate with homemade or fresh diets.
Moreover, formulating a nutritionally complete and balanced diet for pets requires a deep understanding of their specific nutritional requirements. Veterinarians can confidently recommend commercial diets that have undergone thorough research and testing. These diets often include essential nutrients in precise proportions, contributing to optimal pet health.
Another crucial consideration is the potential for nutritional imbalances and deficiencies in homemade or fresh diets. Crafting a nutritionally sound diet for pets involves careful attention to ingredient selection, nutrient content, and preparation methods. Without proper knowledge and guidance, pet owners may inadvertently expose their pets to nutritional inadequacies that could impact their health over time.
To put this simply, veterinarians know that a well-formulated dry diet (for example, Royal Canin) is everything an animal needs. These diets are safe and reliable, too.
If you’ve heard anything else, check your source. Are they trying to promote an agenda and/or sell you on a different product?
As we step into 2024, a viral news story has circulated suggesting that Purina dog food poses a threat to your pet’s health. Despite widespread concerns regarding Purina dog food making dogs sick, please note that there is currently no substantiated evidence supporting the claims propagated across various social media platforms.
If you’ve come across our blog post, it’s essential to clarify that the information you’ve encountered is unfounded and likely falls under the category of fake news.
We understand that a lot of anxiety and panic surrounds the issue of pet food and what is safe to feed our dogs, so we’re addressing this today with the most up-to-date information we can find.
I’ll dive into this more below, but here is what we do know:
There is NO Purina Recall in 2024, as of this writing (January 5th)
There are no “soft recalls”. Purina foods are well stocked at all major retailers
Despite the implication that hundreds or even thousands of dogs are sick from Purina Foods, no one has provided proof
Many of the “sick pets” have illnesses such as Parvo that can easily be attributed to a root cause that has nothing to do with the food they were fed
No toxicology reports or post-mortem autopsy reports (necropsy) have been produced, not one
The Pet Vet Corner Group is actively in contact with Purina and has indicated that Purina foods are (and have been) safe to feed
In the U.S., the solid majority of practicing veterinarians who see 100’s of dogs each month are not concerned, and no, it’s not because of “kickbacks” (that is a myth)
The FDA is looking into the reports (note, this doesn’t mean there is a problem, only that they must investigate things if enough people complain)
Influencers such as Dr. Judy Morgan are capitalizing on the panic to gain likes and followers, which they leverage to sell educational materials, holistic food, and supplements
Updates
This section will be ongoing to include important and relevant information.
January 30th 2024
On January 30th, 2024, at approximately 1 pm MST, Dr. Judy Morgan shared a video on her Facebook account. In the video, she disclosed that despite investing $4000 in testing, none of the samples she submitted were found to be toxic or hazardous. Further details on this update are provided below.
February 2nd, 2024 – Snopes released a well-cited article with information about the claims against Purina. Of course, their journalism on this aligns with what I’ve written in this blog post below.
“Snopes posted in the Facebook group to solicit comments from members willing to provide a verified, confirmed report (i.e., necropsy from a veterinarian) that linked Purina dog food directly to their dog’s illness or death. As of this publication, we have not received a response.” – Snopes
March 6th, 2024—Dr. Judy Morgan released another video on her social media channels, this time with information about the results she received from a second round of laboratory testing on Purina food. This time, the food had been sourced from pet parents who believed their pets were made ill by the food and sent it to Dr. Morgan to be tested. Once again, the laboratory found nothing concerning about the food.
Dr. Morgan deflected from this result by generating a narrative that the toxin must be some rodent poison the lab was not testing for. She presented a handful of theories to propagate continued conspiracy about this topic.
We encourage you to note that Hello Danes is a research-backed informational source for dog owners. Leveraging fear and panic in exchange for clicks is against our code of ethics, so while many blog posts on this topic may attempt to induce anxiety and panic about Purina dog food, you won’t find that here.
Read on!
Is Purina Dog Food Making Dogs Sick?
The current viral claims suggest that Purina is indifferent to the health of pets, refusing to recall the supposedly harmful dog food.
Purina is a big player in the pet food market with an average yearly sales volume of 20 billion U.S.D. (Compare this to a small brand like Diamond, averaging just 1.5 billion U.S.D.). That makes Purina pet food a prime target for fake news about recalls and toxins.
A group on Facebook (that I refuse to name, but if you’ve been there you know which group I’m talking about) has become the central hub for reports and activity related to Purina dog food making dogs sick. This group is engaging in cult-like activity, an observation that I will touch on below.
The claims being made indicate that Purina food has made dogs “sick”. Others blame their dogs’ seizures on the food. The symptoms vary considerably.
It’s important to understand that while the group has produced many claims of dogs being made ill after eating Purina, they’ve produced absolutely no proof of a link. In most cases, they don’t even have a veterinary diagnosis.
The truth is that pet owners are terrible at understanding their own pets’ health and the root cause of behaviors and medical conditions. Just because somebody thinks Purina dog food made their pet throw up or have a seizure, doesn’t mean the food had any role in it happening.
Is Purina Harming Dogs, or Are People Harming Their Pets?
It’s very interesting to look at this from a social perspective. If a well-meaning pet owner is feeding Purina and is presented with information that Purina is harming dogs, they may begin to feel that their pet has been harmed by the food, too.
What may have been a tummy ache from counter surfing is quickly blamed on Purina. The owner panics and shares this information with others, compounding a building problem of viral social anxiety. It doesn’t matter if their pet has been doing phenomenally on the food, having eaten it for years.
Every digestive issue, bump, or behavior may now be assigned to the food by the pet owner, who is reacting with anxiety and fear.
Worse, this owner is now particularly susceptible to being taken advantage of as others beg them to immediately stop feeding Purina, purchase expensive supplements, pay $10 for a list of “approved” pet diets, and “detox” their dog immediately with a cocktail of herbs and vitamins.
They may even be led to completely disregard their veterinarian regarding nutrition, surgery, health care, vaccines, and parasite prevention. This leads to a form of medical neglect and abuse that is not talked about enough!
Guilt, fear, panic, and anxiety rule in this situation, and that’s not healthy.
Does Purina Contain Toxic Heavy Metals?
The event that set off the current Purina Panic was a post on Facebook from a “friend of a friend“. In the original post, she warned pet parents not to feed Purina because her friend’s dogs were very ill after eating Pro Plan.
In that post, an image of a toxicology report from Kansas State University indicated that heavy metals were present in the food, leading to allegations that Purina had become unsafe to feed. This report lacked important information about the test, including reference numbers and the exact formula that was tested; leading many to have questions about its validity.
Despite this, the holistic pet community hitched its wagon to that report and launched its latest smear campaign against Purina (and now, all kibble).
Within two weeks the post with the toxicology report disappeared. While concerned pet parents continue to reference that content as fact, the truth is that the food had been tested again and it was shown that there were no problems with it.
Purina and the FDA had looked into the report and the claims being made and found nothing wrong with the food. Not only that, no other adverse events were reported in association with that particular batch/lot number.
Chances are, the ‘friend’ referenced in the original post had three sick dogs who had gotten into something. Anti-freeze or rat poison are common toxins that cause health problems emergency veterinarians treat all too often.
Update: January 30th, 2024 NO Toxins Found in Purina Pet Food
Dr. Judy Morgan invested close to $4000 to dispatch samples of Purina food to a laboratory for testing. Neither the specific lab utilized nor the formula and lot numbers were disclosed.
Around 1 PM MST on January 30th, 2024, Dr. Morgan published a video on her Facebook Page, stating that the results were in and none of the tested samples contained harmful levels of the substances examined.
In other words, repeated tests from multiple independent labs show that Purina does NOT contain toxins or dangerous substances.
Many of us had demanded transparency, and hoped she would provide this information even if it didn’t support the arguments of “Saving Pets”. She embedded the details about the test results within the video, compelling people to interact with her content to discover the truth.
I think the pet community deserves to see it in writing.
In the video, she says that the samples were tested for:
Vitamin D
Salmonella, Listeria, and Clostridium
Aflatoxins
Heavy metals including cadmium, selenium, and arsenic (possibly others)
Pentobarbital (Euthanasia Drug and Anti-Seizure Medication)
Melamine
None of the food that was tested was high in any of those values.
I believe the logical progression for Dr. Morgan would be to now share the lab reports with pet owners, as well as the FDA and Purina, for review.
Transparency in this process is a reasonable thing for people to ask for.
In the video, she tried to downplay the significance of the test results by criticizing the AAFCO for what she perceived as its lax approach to regulations.
In the video, Dr. Morgan mentioned her intention to send samples from “known affected lots” for testing. She also outlined her intention to explore other potential toxins and to persist with testing until she uncovers the root cause.
As a writer and pet owner, I’m intrigued. With numerous pets supposedly falling ill at the hands of (from what they believe to be) one culprit, why aren’t people exploring alternative possibilities? If they genuinely seek to address the issue, and multiple independent tests consistently indicate that the food isn’t the problem, why not investigate other potential sources?
Purina Dog Food Health Claims
In 2023, Purina did remove the probiotics from their Pro Plan Sensitive Skin and Stomach line. This understandably did cause a few dogs some digestive issues as they adjusted to the new formula.
That doesn’t mean that Purina is full of toxins. It means that an already sensitive dog struggled with a diet change. It’s not fun for the pet owner or the dog, but it’s not inherently harmful, either (especially for those with a great relationship with their veterinarian).
Does Purina Cause Seizures
The implication that Purina causes seizures in dogs is blatantly false. That would require Purina foods to be laced with absolutely toxic levels of heavy metals. Why would Purina, who has no interest in losing profits or being part of a massive media frenzy, sell contaminated food?
Legacy pet food companies such as Purina, Hill’s, and Royal Canin stand out as the only brands that extensively employ and utilize substantial and expert teams consisting of veterinary nutritionists, food scientists, safety experts, researchers, and quality control specialists.
These companies not only own their manufacturing facilities but also rigorously test products at every stage, from raw ingredients to the final products available on store shelves.
The notion that a multitude of highly educated experts would be involved in producing toxic or dangerous pet food is entirely unfounded. From a logical standpoint, it simply doesn’t make sense. None of those people employed by these companies wants that on their resume.
On the flip side, caution is warranted with smaller pet food brands. Lacking the sales volume, highly qualified nutritionists, and research budgets of larger counterparts, many of these brands don’t even produce their own food.
A significant number of the pricey “holistic” pet foods and supplements are manufactured in large factories producing hundreds of other brands. The pretty bags are nothing more than good marketing.
Not to mention, it’s much easier for small pet food brands to get by by with selling contaminated pet food. Just take a look at the unprecedented 2023 Victor recall, proving that the brand had not been testing for or mitigating bacteria for at least a year.
What Percentage of Pets Have Become Sick on Purina?
Purina feeds over 100 million dogs and cats every year.
If the reported statistics were accurate (as of this writing, supposedly 664 dogs, and 219 cats for a total of 894 pets), it would mean that:
0.000894% of pets fed certain foods have supposedly been harmed.
The figure is extremely low, especially when taking into account that it includes dogs fed a variety of diets, not limited to Purina alone.
If we add in the daily meals of the other brands implicated in this panic about kibble (which include Hill’s, Royal Canin, Instinct, and others), the percentage of “affected pets” related to “pets fed” is even lower than the number listed above.
If the food were genuinely toxic or hazardous, we would witness a much higher number of ill pets (and veterinary records to go with them).
Any pet harmed by food is one pet too many. However, there is no supporting evidence from veterinary records or toxicology reports for any of the 894 pets included in this statistic, as far as we have seen.
Pets are added to this tally without considering their existing health conditions, and often in the absence of a veterinary diagnosis or test results. The criteria for adding a pet to this list is unclear and lacks both transparency and attention to detail.
Understandably, individuals are in pain and seeking something to hold responsible. The loss or illness of a pet is always a heartbreaking experience. Pets, however, become sick and often die regardless of the diet being fed.
It’s correlation, not necessarily causation.
As the community of concerned pet parents has grown, so too has the list of foods categorized as “toxic” or “dangerous” by those compiling these statistics.
The Number of Pets Harmed by Purina is Made Up
Upon reviewing the Facebook group, numerous accounts detail pets allegedly harmed by Purina (and other brands of foods).
However, these accounts lack essential evidence such as toxicology reports, blood panels, or necropsies, relying solely on speculations attributing the harm to Purina.
Many of the pets in these anecdotal reports had suffered for days without seeing a veterinarian, before passing away. The owners blamed the food when any number of things could have been wrong.
One instance involved a member sharing a photo of their deceased puppy at 9 weeks, where they blamed Purina as the cause of death. The owner casually mentioned that the veterinarian had diagnosed the puppy with Parvo (a deadly and common disease), but they felt that was incorrect and the puppy’s Purina food was to blame.
Another account comes from a pet parent who shared her experience of feeding a 50/50 mix of Victor foods and raw meals, only to observe her dogs developing bloody stools. In an attempt to address the issue, she switched to a similar combination with Purina, but unfortunately, the problem persisted.
Not surprisingly, the blame was placed solely on Purina, overlooking the fact that salmonella, a known cause of bloody stools, was the reason behind the 2023 Victor Recall. It’s crucial to recognize that raw food can also carry a risk of bacterial contamination.
In another story, a dog suffered for 5 days with symptoms that should warranted an emergency veterinary visit. The owner didn’t take him to the veterinarian for a diagnosis, and instead, bought aspirin to give him. She blamed Purina for his death while admitting that he’d not eaten Purina at all for the past 6 months.
These stories and many more just like them are added to the growing list of pets ‘harmed or killed by Purina’. This list is the same one that “holistic” veterinarians and moderators of this Facebook group are passing around as absolute facts.
I have no doubts that there are sick pets. The doubt comes in when assessing the root cause, and determining if the food itself is actually the problem.
As the group has grown, additional brands have also come under scrutiny. This has triggered a surge of frantic activity as anxious pet owners hastily switch foods in response to the heightened concern.
Suffice it to say that a significant number of the “reports” are likely nothing more than owners who have misdiagnosed their pets at home. When you consider that these are often the same people who don’t trust legitimate practicing veterinarians, this tracks.
Knowing the reach that the Pet Vet Corner group has in the pet owner community, Purina was eager to respond.
Purina clarified that:
46 million dogs and 68 million cats eat Purina food each year
The quality assurance team at Purina Pet Foods leads more than 100,000 quality checks every single day, across the entire manufacturing process
Purina states that false statements about the brand are resulting in unnecessary stress for pet parents (we agree)
They take safety and quality very seriously
Confidently, Purina also emphasized the importance of pet parents critically evaluating the sources behind the claims. They acknowledged that while some posts are from well-intentioned individuals genuinely concerned and aiming to assist, many other posts intentionally generate chaos and distrust, often as a means to promote and sell alternative products.
Is Purina Horse Feed and Chicken Feed Killing Animals?
As if the claims about Purina pet foods weren’t enough, new content has surfaced implying that Purina Horse Feed and Chicken Feed are also causing health problems in animals.
It’s important to note that Purina Mills (horse & chicken feed) is owned by Land O’ Lakes and is a completely different company than Nestle Purina (maker of dog and cat food).
They do not share funding, facilities, or staff. Nestle Purina and Purina Mills are distinct entities, despite their shared name. Anyone disseminating misinformation on this subject is, once again, spreading false news.
What Should I Do if Purina Made My Dog Sick?
If you believe that Purina made your dog sick, you need to first speak with your veterinarian. Take the following steps:
Seek emergency veterinary care, if necessary
Document the symptoms
Write down anything else unusual about the day the symptoms began. Did your pet get food off the counter, eat bunny droppings in the yard, get into the trash, jump off the deck too hard, or nose around in a place where they don’t belong?
Make a document with a list of all foods, supplements, treats, and medications that your pet may have ingested in the past 30 days
Keep the bag of food to submit for testing if necessary
Don’t panic. There are many reasons for a dog to have symptoms (including seizures) that are completely unrelated to the food you are feeding.
Until there is a legitimate FDA statement and published recall, there is no need to panic or be concerned about your pet’s Purina Dog Food or the advice given by your veterinarian when it comes to nutrition, vaccines, and flea/tick prevention.
The Rumor Mill & Purina Pet Food with Dr. Em
Dr. Em is a veterinarian with a scientifically grounded YouTube channel. Her videos present factual information supported by evidence and the professional consensus of her peers.
She prioritizes a rational approach over fear-based tactics and sensationalism, and it’s a breath of fresh air!
If, after reading this post, you find yourself still on the fence regarding the safety of Purina pet foods and other kibble brands, please watch her video on this topic.
I also highly recommend checking out this podcast, which highlights Dr. Ruthann Lobos in an in-depth and approachable discussion about myths and misconceptions in pet food marketing. Many evidence-based veterinarians are speaking out on this topic, and have some incredibly valuable information to share!
This section is for you if you want to dive with me into how a social phenomenon like this happens. Given how many pet parents have felt untold anxiety over this, it’s worth discussing.
Celebrity veterinarians and influencers such as Dr. Judy Morgan (and others) have capitalized on the “Purina Panic” to gain likes and followers, which they leverage publicly to sell holistic food and supplements.
The more people they can get to share content on the topic of “toxic Purina dog food”, the more people they can engage with their platform.
Topics like this are sensational and this particular one took off like a freight train.
The people who follow Dr. Morgan truly believe they’ve been provided with “the truth”, and “insider information” that the big companies and veterinarians won’t tell them.
Pet Parents are implored, by many of these influencers to disregard the information they hear from traditionally reputable sources (veterinarians, educated professionals, scientists, etc.).
Anybody who speaks up with an opposing viewpoint or legitimate data is canceled. Their posts and content are removed, and they aren’t allowed to comment.
Members of Dr. Judy Morgan’s and the “Saving Pets” group following will reply with hate, vitriol, and snark towards anybody who presents with information that challenges what they are being told by their “leader”.
Perhaps the most alarming thing of all is that provocative content is designed to incite panic and fear, and to what end?
Follow the money. If a pet owner is concerned about something they have fed or given their pet, Dr. Morgan (who set the stage for that anxiety to build in the first place) and similar influencers can swoop in with solutions.
Courses, memberships, recipes, and supplements can all be conveniently purchased, so pet parents can make sure their pet “lives forever”.
This doesn’t mean that these influencers aren’t well-meaning. Many things like this start with concern and a desire to help.
People need to ask more questions. However, these inquiries should not be directed solely at established pet food companies with extensive research histories and expert teams dedicated to nutrition science and food safety.
Instead, the focus should shift towards questioning the self-proclaimed leaders who undermine these seasoned experts, especially if they are using panic to drive affiliate clicks, social engagement, and sales of the products they recommend.
Predatory Influencers & Social Media Groups
While Dr. Judy Morgan has spearheaded much of the current panic about Purina dog food, she is not alone. Many influencers are leveraging the Purina-Panic to boost their engagement on TikTok, Instagram, Blogs, and Facebook.
A large group on Facebook has become a hub for this viral activity. They claim to be fighting a good fight against “big pet food” and have begun passing out questionable nutrition, medical, and veterinary advice to members. The group in question is gaining hundreds of new members each day.
I’m not going to lie – that group is one of many just like it, and it’s terrifying.
Here are just a few of the culty tactics being used in this group to promote the unfounded idea that Purina Pro Plan, Purina One, and Purina Dog Chow (and now all kibble) are killing pets:
Removing comments that contain verifiable facts and opposing viewpoints
Banning members who challenge what is being said or recommended
Allowing and even encouraging members to practice veterinary medicine without a license (diagnosing and providing holistic “treatments”)
Actively discouraging members from trusting their real veterinarian
Discrediting established experts including veterinarians, food and nutrition scientists, and published research
“Love bombing” those who have joined the group, and reminding them that only they are doing the right thing for their pet
Recommending unproven and potentially dangerous treatments such as “detoxing” as part of their health and wellness protocols
Creating an “insiders” vs. “outsiders” community, where those in the group are “in the know” and those outside of it are harming their pets
Shaming anybody who doesn’t follow the belief system (applying guilt, fear, and anxiety to those who don’t “do better” for their pets)
Posting deliberately false, fake, and incorrect information as fact
Allowing the platform to be a hub of blatant misinformation, instead of moderating content that may cause unnecessary stress, anxiety, and hardship for people
Encouraging members to ignore experts, including scientists and veterinarians, under the belief that those people don’t care about pets and all of them are “shills with a bad agenda“
Purposefully deflecting away from verifiable information that doesn’t support their claims
It’s appalling how much of this aligns with Dr. Hassan’s BITE model for cults and cult behavior!
What’s even more concerning is that some members and leaders of these groups have been actively discouraging people from seeking veterinary care and/or having their pet food tested for toxins and pathogens.
Testing the food is a crucial first step in identifying potential issues, but the group suggests that sending samples for testing is futile because “major laboratories are [allegedly] affiliated with prominent pet food brands”.
In essence, they propagate a conspiracy theory, insinuating a cover-up.
Author’s Note: We believe that they fear that if thousands of individuals test Purina Pro Plan and the results demonstrate that the food is clean, their misinformation campaign will unravel. If this group truly wanted to save pets, they would work with Purina to sort out the alleged problem.
The “Saving Pets” group is now telling members that if they go to the media to share their stories, they must first communicate with the group leaders.
They want to fully control the narrative. If that is not a red flag, I don’t know what is.
All Kibble is “Bad”
As of mid-January 2024, the “Saving Pets” group has raised and promoted concerns regarding all types of kibble. They are advising their members that no kibble, regardless of brand, can be considered safe for feeding pets.
Within hours of her posting that video revealing the test results, Saving Pets doubled down on their campaign advising members to switch as quickly as possible to a fresh or raw diet with no kibble.
This appears to be a deliberate effort to shift the discussion away from the test results that did not support their claim that “Purina is full of Toxins.“
The “acceptable” brands recommended in the group include AllProvide, a fresh food brand in which Dr. Morgan has a huge stake.
For those unable to afford commercially prepared fresh or raw diets, Saving Pets advises preparing homemade cooked meals for their pets.
Group members and administrators caution against seeking assistance from Board Certified Veterinary Nutritionists for recipes, asserting that those professionals are unqualified “shills for big kibble” and may only provide recipes rich in carbohydrates and synthetic vitamins, according to the group’s perspective.
I am concerned that this panic will lead many into feeding unbalanced diets that ultimately, do harm their pets.
Pet Food Misinformation & Armchair Veterinarians
I mentioned above that the group is banning members and deleting comments that question the leaders and the advice being given. They are not, however, shutting down blatant misinformation.
In just 10 minutes, I found the following statements (which, suspiciously, remain un-moderated). Some of the comments came directly from moderators:
“If the pet parent has received a Covid vaccine, they have shed Covid on their pet and that’s why their pet is dead”
“After a hurricane when the dead animals are floating around, they are picked up in trucks and taken to the Purina pet food factory”
“Pet food contains snake venom. It’s true.”
“Covid wasn’t a virus. We were all being poisoned with snake venom in our food and our pets food!”
“Veterinarians sell euthanized pets to the rendering plant and the pets are ground up and used in pet food. The collars aren’t even removed, they grind those up, too.”
“Veterinarians prescribe things to keep your pet sick so they can make more money off of you.”
“CBD is the only safe way to treat seizures, read this guide on it, and don’t take your veterinarian’s advice, they don’t know as much as you do.”
“Do not take your dog to a vet! They will only shame you for your choices. This herb is all you need.”
“All Purina food is manufactured in China.”
“If you don’t feed a whole raw or homemade diet, you shouldn’t even have pets.”
What does the group gain from allowing extreme misinformation to be spread? More panic, more anxiety, and more alarm. All of which drive engagement, clicks, and sales.
Author’s Note: All of the above statements in the list are easily debunked with actual science and proven facts. At Hello Danes, we do not endorse, subscribe to, promote, or believe in the statements shared in the above list titled “pet food misinformation”. The list was created using actual statements from members of a public Facebook group.
How to Spot Misinformation on Social Media
If you are struggling to understand how so many people screaming from the rooftops can be so wrong, this part of the blog post is for you! When you are digesting media about pet care, dog nutrition, and veterinary science, cross-check the information you receive against facts.
This checklist of how to spot social media misinformation can help guide you!
Verify Sources
Cross-check information from reputable sources, such as official statements from Purina, veterinary organizations, or trusted news outlets.
The only way to verify that a dog food product has been recalled is by visiting the FDA recalls page. If it’s not listed there as an active recall, then it doesn’t exist.
Reach out to the company being accused! A quick note to Purina itself can help clear up a lot of misinformation and misgivings you may have, for example.
While they do have an interest in maintaining a good public appearance, there is no reason to believe that they are trying to cover anything up. That’s a bad business practice that would be devastating to their financial success.
When consuming content from bloggers and social media influencers, it’s important to evaluate the sources of their information.
Are they drawing from reputable and credible sources, or are they employing excessive embellishments to provoke panic and fear, conveniently distorting the truth?
Guard Yourself Against Predatory Influencers
Be aware of influencers who attempt to deceive by presenting closed or outdated recalls as if they were present-day issues. Many of the so-called ‘recalls’ causing panic are resolved and belong to the past.
Stay vigilant and don’t be swayed by misinformation that inaccurately portrays outdated concerns as immediate threats.
Be wary of any controversial type of influencer who is primed to present you with a solution to the problem they claim is there, especially in the form of an affiliate link or product you can purchase. Don’t let them control your mind with panic and fear-based sales tactics.
An affiliate link presented in good faith, for a product that could be helpful to pet owners is one thing. A profitable link presented to pet parents as a solution to anxiety and fear is another. That’s the one you need to watch out for.
Fact-Check the Information You Hear
Use legitimate and unbiased fact-checking websites to verify the accuracy of claims. Misinformation often crumbles under scrutiny.
In reaction to misinformation being challenged, you might observe that members involved in cult-like behavior may dismiss the facts as part of an intricate plot, urging you to distrust experts, disregard your veterinarian, and be suspicious about individuals with legitimate credentials.
Instilling doubt in experts (in this case veterinarians, veterinary nutritionists, and legacy pet food brands such as Purina that are backed by decades of nutrition research) is a fundamental aspect of cult mind control.
Exercise extreme caution in navigating this situation and promptly disregard any commentary that intentionally undermines those with authority.
Evaluate the Expertise of the Person Giving the Information
Assess the credentials of those providing information. Celebrity status doesn’t necessarily equate to expertise, especially when promoting alternative products such as ‘detoxes’ and supplements.
This holds even when the individual is an expert with a veterinary degree!
If a particular expert, such as Dr. Judy Morgan for example, holds an opinion that diverges significantly from the consensus of their peers, it’s essential to treat them as an outlier and subject their views to thorough scrutiny.
Dr. Karen Becker is another veterinarian whose profit-driven platform and controversial perspectives warrant careful consideration and questioning.
While it’s acceptable and even encouraged for content creators, including bloggers like myself, to share information about various pet care choices, it’s important to verify that their opinions align with science, research, and evidence.
Pseudoscience, alarmist marketing, and woo-woo theories unfortunately sell very well on social media; learn how to spot it.
Holistic Veterinarians and Controversial Medicine
Be alert to signs that raise doubts about the authenticity of stories, particularly those from public-facing veterinarians who label themselves “holistic.”
The term “holistic” implies consideration for the entire body.
In theory, a truly holistic approach means addressing the pets well being with every tool available (including science, research, and medicine).
Holistic should not mean:
Discrediting and avoiding conventional veterinarians altogether
Dismissing legitimate science
Exclusively opting for “natural” treatments, forgoing anything related to evidence-based veterinary medicine (a practice that may result in medical neglect and abuse)
Because many “holistic” practitioners unfortunately promote and adopt the beliefs listed above, the term “holistic” may serve as a warning signal.
I’ve extensively researched the “holistic veterinarians” and “experts” propagating the current media frenzy surrounding Purina. It’s noteworthy that each one of them has a potential financial stake if allegations against “big pet food” prove to be true.
They have the financial motivation to drive people away from evidence-based veterinarians and science-backed pet foods. I find this ironic, given how often they promote the idea that their traditional veterinary peers are “shills for Big Pharma” and only recommend foods because they “receive kickbacks“.
There is, of course, a time and a place for “holistic” care and natural remedies. My veterinarian falls into the category of “integrative” and we do use some natural treatments for the animals in our home. At its core, “holistic” is not the problem (nor should it be).
As a community of pet lovers, we must draw the line on profit-driven misinformation. Many “Holistic” influencers have taken on the role of contemporary snake oil salespeople, offering unproven and often overstated solutions to exaggerated problems. It’s easy to sell things when what you promote is controversial.
They are often primed and ready to sell a course, book, membership, or supplement to solve our problems as pet owners, all the while utilizing provocative marketing tactics to make it happen.
Because Holistic medicine falls on a spectrum, it’s important that we recognize the role thoughtfully implemented holistic care may have in our pet’s health.
However, more importantly, we need to recognize when “holistic” has gone too far.
Author’s Note: Everybody deserves to earn a living when they share their skills and talents. At Hello Danes, we do use affiliate links to help us pay for the costs associated with running this site. We also put a lot of effort into aligning ourselves with experts and presenting research-based facts. To be fully ethical and transparent, I have chosen to turn off ad serving on this particular article.
Holistic Veterinarians & the Alt-Right
In one post on Facebook, a “holistic” veterinarian (Dr. Barb Fox) suggested that links in her Facebook posts weren’t working because “Big Pet Food wants to prevent her from sharing the truth“.
This resembles the conspiracy-style content often associated with members of the far-right group QAnon.
When someone with credentials, like a veterinary degree, demonstrates a lack of critical thinking like this, it’s wise to disengage. Guard your time and attention, as misinformation can hinder your decision-making about pet care.
It’s noteworthy that like all of the others, this “holistic” veterinarian who is spreading misinformation and predatory content operates a website selling online courses and books to solve your pet’s health problems the “natural” way.
The formula is simple: induce anxiety in pet parents, create a sense of community, and sell the solution.
On her Facebook page, Dr. Barb Fox shares content from an alt-right news source, signaling a concerning perspective. This is a discussion for another day, but it’s important to note that holistic wellness and elitism about pet food is a pipeline that feeds directly into anti-science conspiracies and alt-right belief systems.
Holistic integrative “wellness” is often a dog whistle and that’s unfortunate. Too many “holistic” influencers promote anti-science and anti-veterinarian content, and that’s both dangerous and worth talking about.
There is room for natural solutions and holistic care in science-backed veterinary medicine. But this is not it.
The current media panic about Purina conveniently serves her financial interests, as it does for most other “holistic” veterinarians with online platforms. They are riding this wave for every penny it’s worth.
Please leave thoughtful questions and comments below!
Disclaimer: As the author, I want to clarify that I am not affiliated with Purina. They have not sponsored or funded this article, and our site does not receive compensation from them. In adherence to ethical considerations, ad serving for this particular article has been disabled. This post does not generate any profits for the blog or myself and has been published at my own expense.
Comment Moderation: This blog does not tolerate misinformation or hate speech that is directed toward the author, readers of this blog, or veterinary professionals. Constructive and well-articulated arguments from both perspectives of this discussion are welcomed and will be approved as time allows, provided they contain verifiable information and contribute to thoughtful discussions on the topic.
Bloat is no joke, and the stakes are higher when you’re dealing with larger breeds. So, grab a cup of coffee, get cozy, and let’s chat about how we can proactively ensure our big buddies steer clear of this deadly condition! No fluff, just the stuff that matters.
In this topic, I’m covering 5 ways to prevent bloat in big dogs.
What is Bloat in Dogs?
Bloat, scientifically known as gastric dilation and volvulus (GDV), is like the canine version of a stomach nightmare. Picture this: your big, lovable goofball is happily going about the day when suddenly, things take a twist – literally.
The stomach fills up with gas, fluid, or air, causing it to swell like a balloon. That’s not even the worst part. That inflated stomach can twist on itself, cutting off blood supply and playing havoc with your pup’s well-being and internal organs.
It’s a serious medical emergency, and our oversized companions are particularly prone to it.
It is believed that around 20% of dogs over 100 lbs will experience this in their lifetime. That’s 1 in 5!
So, in a nutshell, bloat is the kind of party we want to avoid in the doggy digestive system. Stay with me, folks – we’re just scratching the surface.
What Are The Signs that a Dog is Bloating?
If you are at all concerned that your dog is bloating, you must visit a veterinarian ASAP. Mere minutes can be the difference between life and death, even if your pet has had a gastropexy (more on this later).
Here are the signs of bloat in dogs:
Swollen Belly: Keep an eye out for a rapidly expanding midsection, a sure sign something’s amiss.
Unproductive Vomiting: If Fido’s trying to vomit but nothing’s coming up, it’s a red flag.
Restlessness: Excessive pacing, unable to find a comfy spot – a sign of discomfort.
Excessive Drooling: More slobber than usual can signal a problem in the belly department.
Difficulty Breathing: Labored breathing or rapid panting – breathing should never be a struggle.
Pale Gums: Check those gums – if they’re losing color, it’s time to act fast.
Collapse: In severe cases, your buddy might collapse – an emergency.
1. Keep Your Pup Happy to Prevent GDV
Statistically speaking, anxious, nervous, and aggressive dogs are more likely to bloat. Regarding the risk of bloating in our colossal canines, temperament plays a surprising role.
Why is this? A confident pet tends to keep the digestive system in harmony, while the anxious types might unknowingly set the stage for gastric drama.
Think about a time when you were nervous. Did you get the classic symptoms of “bubble gut”? Anxiety causes digestive issues in humans and pets!
Anxious, fearful, and aggressive dogs tend to gulp their meals down. This is a form of stress that may increase their risk of bloat.
Here are some common sense ways to reduce stress, anxiety, and aggression in your pet:
Choose Good Breeders: Temperament is largely genetic. Nervous, flighty, anxious, and aggressive dogs often receive these traits from their parents.
Routine Rules: Dogs love a schedule. Stick to regular feeding times, walks, and play – predictability is their happy place.
Cozy Safe Spots: Create a haven where your pet can retreat when the world feels overwhelming. A comfy bed or cozy corner works wonders.
Exercise Galore: A tired dog is a happy dog. Regular walks and playtime help burn off excess energy and keep anxiety at bay.
Positive Reinforcement: Reward good behavior with treats and affection. Positive reinforcement goes a long way in building a chilled-out attitude. Ditch the outdated intimidation-based training methods that instill fear.
Gentle Introductions: Socialize smartly. Gradual introductions to new people, pets, and environments can prevent stress-triggered meltdowns.
Mind Games: Keep those brains buzzing with puzzle toys and games. Mental stimulation is a secret weapon against boredom-induced anxiety.
Consistent Rules: Be clear on the rules and stick to them. Consistency breeds confidence, reducing uncertainty and stress.
Managing meals and feeding habits is a key to bloat prevention in dogs.
Your dog should not consider mealtime a speed-eating contest! Encourage slow, stress-free meal times by offering more frequent meals and feeding from puzzles and slow feeder bowls.
I love this stainless steel slow feeder because it holds 4 cups and can be properly washed and sanitized (so you prevent chin acne). The Kong Wobbler is also a huge hit in our house! It’s easy to fill, fun to use and only allows the dog to eat a few kibbles at a time.
Discourage your big dog from inhaling their meals. If you have a dog that also tends to resource guard food (snarling, growling, and snapping), manage the environment to prevent that behavior and the anxiety that comes with it.
Never feed a single large meal, as it increases the risk of bloat. We recommend offering 2-3 meals/day instead.
Because big dogs tend to have sensitive digestive systems, you may find that slow eating and more frequent meals help resolve chronic loose stools, too!
3. Surprising New Science – Movement After Meals is Good!
It’s long been promoted that large and giant breed dogs should rest before and after meals to prevent bloat. It turns out, this might be nothing more than an old wives tale! Worse, resting after meals may have the opposite effect than intended.
A fascinating discovery has emerged that challenges conventional wisdom—movement after meals may play a crucial role in preventing bloat
While the subject is still under scrutiny, early findings suggest that moderate exercise following meals could aid in reducing the risk of bloat by as much as 50%.
It’s important to approach this evolving insight with cautious optimism, acknowledging the need for further research to solidify these claims.
However, I believe this makes a lot of sense. After a big meal, a lot of people will move or walk. This helps the digestive system do its job and move things along. We want our dogs to digest their food, not have it hang out in their stomach pulling on their gastric ligaments.
Rest doesn’t prevent bloat, no matter how much people want to believe it does. Most dogs who present to the veterinarian with bloat/GDV were resting when symptoms began.
Take a common sense approach to this. Don’t run a marathon after a large meal, but there is no need to lock down all movement, either.
4. Meat Meals & Fresh Foods to Reduce Bloat in Dogs
Research shows that feeding kibble with rendered meat or bone meal as a main ingredient can reduce the risk of bloat. It is also believed that adding canned or fresh foods to the diet plays a key role!
In the pursuit of promoting optimal health for Great Danes and other large-breed dogs, the choice of diet emerges as a critical factor.
For example, Royal Canin Giant Breed dog food was researched and developed to reduce the risk of bloat in dogs over 100 lbs. It is a formula based on a rendered meat and bone meal, with large kibble pieces that encourage slow eating.
Here are links to other foods that are recommended for feeding large and giant breed dogs. Look for a named meat meal in the ingredients list!
Canned foods and fresh foods can also be added to the diet to promote good digestion and health. While the exact mechanism behind this is unknown, studies do show that dogs fed only kibble are at a higher risk of bloat.
When adding fresh foods, stick to the 90/10 rule. Unbalanced foods must make up 10% or less of the diet. For dogs under age two, 5% or less is a safer ratio.
Most canned food is balanced, so it can make up a larger portion of the overall intake. Just Food for Dogs is also a great way to add fresh foods that are balanced!
For fresh options straight from your kitchen, consider the following:
Plain yogurt (in moderation, use sparingly for dogs under the age of 2)
It may be tempting to overdo it with the beautiful fresh foods or to even go all in and start making your pet food in your kitchen. However, we caution heavily against doing this. Most home-cooked diets are nutritionally deficient (or worse, dangerously high in certain minerals and vitamins). This will lead to more health problems than it helps! Read here for more information on homecooked food for dogs.
5. Gastropexy & Bloat in Big Dogs
Gastropexy is the single proven method for reducing complications associated with bloat in dogs.
A “Pexy” refers to a surgical procedure in which the stomach is affixed to the abdominal wall. This simple stomach tack serves as a preventive measure against bloat, preventing the stomach from potentially flipping over, a condition known as torsion.
When performed by a skilled veterinarian, this minor yet life-saving procedure aligns with statistically improved outcomes for larger dog breeds, making it a prudent choice for their well-being.
While the procedure may not eliminate the possibility of bloat, it significantly lowers the chances of torsion, providing peace of mind for both dog owners and their beloved, large canine companions. Veterinarians who work in emergency medicine overwhelmingly support this procedure, which should be done at 18-24 months of age.
Consulting with a veterinarian about the potential benefits of gastropexy for specific breeds and individual dogs is always advisable.
It is typically done during routine spay and neuter or dental cleaning surgeries. Work with an experienced veterinarian who has done the procedure many times!
No matter what, always listen to your veterinarian. Enjoy your pet and don’t stress! Bloat is going to happen or it’s not, it’s much more important to know the signs of dog bloat and be ready with emergency funds to treat it.
Unfortunately, you can do everything right and still have a dog experience bloat. Don’t beat yourself up, and don’t stress. Dog’s lives are short compared to ours, and we must enjoy them while they are here with us!
Leave a comment below! Has your dog experienced bloat?
All three of my dogs were seen by their veterinarian this week for their annual checkup. One of my dogs is 7 years old, and so the topic of joint support for Great Danes and other dogs was brought up. We had a wonderful discussion that involved several key points I just HAD to bring to the blog and share!
To put this simply, there is a good chance you are spending big money on joint support that is not helping your pet. Not all joint support options are created equal!
So if you are looking for the best joint support for your dog, start here.
Why some joint supplements are inferior
How to choose supplements that are safe and effective
Veterinary recommended joint support for big dogs
Types of joint supplements to choose from
Our recommendations
Author’s Note: we talk a LOT about Great Danes and other big dogs on our blog, however, this topic is helpful for all dog owners!
Veterinarian Information about Joint Support for Great Danes
My veterinarian is actually a husband + wife team. They are wonderful and we’ve been seeing (and trusting) them for years. Dr. K has been seeing patients in a clinical setting for decades, and mentioned that he’s been involved with 4 different practices over his career.
He’s seen some things, in other words.
He told me a story about how at one practice, there was no standard protocol for recommending joint support. Each veterinarian would basically throw brand names on the table based on the client’s budget or what they were already using. With time, there became a glaring discrepancy between some dogs.
In the process of watching this play out for many years, he found that some joint supplements were effective, and some weren’t. The key difference is NOTABLE. Check this out:
Consistently, he saw (and still sees) notable improvements in dogs fed joint supplements backed by legitimate trials and research, especially when compared to dogs fed other brands.
He said in many cases, switching to a better brand of joint support can even get some dogs off of Rimadyl and other anti-inflammatory drugs.
One may be inclined to think that all joint support is backed by research and science, but the unfortunate truth here is that many are NOT. You can’t just go by what the bag tells you, either.
Slick marketing doesn’t mean that a company has actually studied the product they are selling.
Read on, friends.
Not All Pet Supplements are Created Equal
Here are some interesting facts about the pet supplement industry:
a. Most joint support options are NOT supported by clinical trials.
b. The supplement industry is largely unregulated, so when you choose brands with no clinical backing, you’re basically stabbing in the dark when it comes to efficacy, bioavailability, and even safety.
This lack of oversight when it comes to the manufacture of pet supplements means that the market is flooded with a myriad of products, varying widely in quality and efficacy.
The absence of standardized guidelines for formulation and testing raises concerns about the consistency and safety of these supplements. While there are some ‘rules’ about making claims on the label, such guidelines are pretty easy to skirt around with good marketing. As pet owners, we are faced with tough decisions!
The brutal truth here is that it’s much less expensive for a company to invest in good marketing and pretty packages than it is for them to invest in dedicated research and stringent quality control.
Consequently, there is a risk of mislabeling, inaccurate dosage information, and even the inclusion of potentially harmful ingredients.
How to Choose the Best Joint Support for Great Danes
After our conversation today, I agree with my veterinarian whole-heartedly!
When it comes to food, supplements, and joint support…are we choosing brands backed by actual clinical research and evidence? Or are we choosing brands because they have good marketing and pretty packages?
This information sent me down a huge rabbit hole of course, but not before I asked him what he felt the best joint support for Great Danes was.
He said overwhelmingly, the ONLY truly safe, effective option where you get your money’s worth is Nutramax Labs.
You’ve probably heard of them, and may even be feeding their supplements! Nutramax makes Cosequin and Dasuquin products.
Thankfully, these products are widely available from Chewy, Amazon, and even Costco! For dogs with mobility issues, Dasuquin Advanced has some additional support to minimize damage to cartilage and is available only from the veterinarian.
Dog Joint Support with Clinical Trials
After this discussion with my veterinarian, I had to look into this.
All of us should be alarmed that so many companies are selling us supplements with no actual science behind them! As a matter of fact, I have found that many supplements on the market are packed by factories that make similar products for any brand with enough money to develop a decent marketing plan.
Anybody can put glucosamine into a bottle and say it’s good for our pets. That doesn’t mean it actually is.
I looked into the research done by Nutramax labs and found some incredible things.
For starters, they own and operate their own research and manufacturing facilities. This means that they have control over every step of the process.
They also published this PDF which outlines just some of the intensive research done into their ingredients and the efficacy of their product.
We should expect this same dedication to our pets health with ALL supplements and food choices we make.
Ingredients in Cosequin & Dasuquin
Of course, one may be inclined to read the ingredients in Cosequin and Dasuquin and believe that a more natural or holistic option would be a better choice.
You may be alarmed by the inclusion of scary words such as “natural flavors” and “magnesium stearate”.
Magnesium Stearate is commonly used in vitamins to keep ingredients or tablets from sticking together. It is considered a safe ingredient, especially when given at the extremely low dose offered in joint supplements.
Make sure that the sources you gain such information from are referencing legitimate science. Pseudoscience and alarmism sells, unfortunately.
The proven, researched active ingredients in Cosequin and Dasuquin products may include:
Glucosamine Hydrochloride
Sodium Chondroitin Sulfate
Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM)
Manganese (Manganese Ascorbate)
Avocado/Soybean Unsaponifiables (ASU) Powder
Green Tea Extract
Each product is slightly different. Dasuquin is the more advanced form of Cosequin and includes additional support (usually for cartilage).
Don’t Waste Your Money on Snake Oil
Holistic influencers like Dr. Karen Becker and Dr. Judy Morgan have made their millions selling untested, unproven supplements and the concept that ‘natural’ is healthier.
Make no mistake. Their online stores are filled with generic products that are co-packed in big factories. There is very little science, research, or trials behind these supplements.
The careful use of words and packaging that appears homemade lead buyers to believe that these choices are wholesome, organic, and better quality.
It’s snake oil and the solid majority of practicing veterinarians will not recommend their products.
How to Find Reputable Pet Food & Supplement Brands
The easiest way to find product recommendations that are backed by research and evidence is to talk to your veterinarian.
They see 100’s of pets every month and know what works, consistently!
You may be inclined to believe that your veterinarian is recommending products because of kickbacks, but that is a dangerous myth. Most of the people who promote that wildly incorrect idea aren’t qualified at all, and may even be practicing veterinary medicine without a license.
Whether we like it or not, a clinically researched food or joint support brand is going to be infinitely safer and healthier for our pets than one that only sounds more ‘wholesome’ on paper.
Veterinarians recommend dog food brands and products that meet their personal standards for safety, efficacy, science, and quality control.
The Best Joint Support for Great Danes
After deep diving into this topic myself, I will now only use and recommend the same joint support that my experienced and highly qualified veterinarian does.
The following options are safe, healthy, and effective for Great Danes and other big dogs:
What is the Difference Between Cosequin & Dasuquin
I used to be VERY confused about this myself, so here is the clarification:
Cosequin primarily contains glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate, key components that support joint health by promoting cartilage development and reducing inflammation.
Dasuquin, often considered a more advanced version, incorporates the same foundational ingredients but adds ASU (avocado/soybean unsaponifiables), which is believed to further support joint function and help maintain cartilage.
This addition is thought to provide enhanced anti-inflammatory effects, potentially making Dasuquin a more comprehensive solution for dogs with existing joint issues.
While both supplements aim to improve joint mobility and alleviate discomfort, the inclusion of ASU in Dasuquin represents a notable distinction between the two. Pet owners should consider their dog’s specific needs, the severity of joint problems, and consult with a veterinarian to determine which supplement to purchase.
When it comes to caring for our canine companions, one of the most critical decisions we face is choosing the right dog food. This choice becomes even more significant when you have a big dog, as their nutritional needs differ from those of smaller breeds. Among the many dog food brands on the market, Purina Pro Plan often stands out as a popular choice for pet owners. But is Purina Pro Plan a good dog food for big dogs?
In this blog post, we’ll explore the key factors to consider when selecting dog food for larger breeds and examine whether Purina Pro Plan lives up to the expectations of providing quality nutrition and meeting the unique requirements of big dogs.
In this post we will talk about:
The benefits of Purina Pro Plan for big dogs
Nutrition science & research
Whether or not Pro Plan & Purina Dog Food is healthy or not
Pet food marketing tactics and myths
The “Too Long, Didn’t Read” Summary about Pro Plan Dog Food
I realize that my blog posts at times become long and involved. So I’m going to spare you that and give you a short run down (for those of you that just need a quick answer).
Purina Pro Plan Large Breed is an exceptional food for all big dogs, including Great Danes.
Now I understand you may have heard otherwise. As a big dog owner, you are bombarded online with cries to feed Victor, Diamond Naturals, 4Health, and Gentle Giants. You’re told to find foods with “low protein” and “better ingredients”.
You’re even told that if you feed your dog a brand like Purina, Pedigree, or Iam’s, you are “feeding your dog fast food” (and thus, are a bad pet parent).
Of course, if an influencer or brand rep can convince you that you are harming your dog, it’s much, much easier for them to sell you their product.
Now if I have your attention, let’s deep dive into why Pro Plan is so popular and why it is a recommended brand for big dogs!
One thing people don’t realize, or know, about the pet food industry is that a solid majority of pet food brands out there are manufactured by companies that:
Do not have a single qualified nutritionist on staff
Do not own or operate their own manufacturing facilities
Never test or research their food or formulations
Will sweep issues under the rug instead of issuing a recall
Create inconsistent products with nutritional values that fluctuate greatly from bag to bag
Use deceptive tactics on the ingredients list to make it appear wholesome and healthy
Formulate products that appeal to humans and their wallets, vs. products that are well researched and truly healthy for pets
Many of these corner-cutting companies produce foods that are sold at a premium price point, with ‘good ingredients’ and wholesome stories health and family.
So here lies the problem.
Deceptive marketing in the pet food industry is a concerning and prevalent issue that puts the health and well-being of our beloved animal companions at risk. Many companies engage in practices that prioritize profit margins over the nutritional needs of pets. From enticing packaging that showcases images of succulent meats and fresh vegetables, to catchy taglines and misleading labels, deceptive marketing tactics can mislead pet owners into purchasing products that, while expensive, are actually subpar in terms of quality and nutritional value.
This can lead to health problems, allergies, growth disorders, and chronic digestive issues for our pets.
FACT: Purina Dog Foods are among only a handful of brands that are NOT cutting corners on formulation, nutritionists, research, or sound manufacturing and quality control practices.
I used to be solidly against Purina foods, because a lot of marketing has gone into making all of us believe that it’s trash. Marketing is often far from the truth, however.
Is Purina Pro Plan a Good Dog Food for Big Dogs?
Yes! Any Pro Plan Large Breed formula is ideal. Here are just a few reasons:
Purina employs a team of 100’s of top researchers, nutritionists, veterinary nutritionists, food scientists, and quality control specialists
All Purina formulas are some of the most well researched and heavily tested foods available anywhere
As a “big 5” company, Purina dog food is fed to billions of pets, successfully
Researchers at Purina have brought forth many peer reviewed studies that have helped veterinarians gain new understanding and insight into disease, cancer, nutrition, growth, dental care, and overall health
Very, very few other companies can even come close to meeting these standards. So even if you question the “ingredients” or don’t like Purina as a company, you cannot deny that they are considered a leader for a reason.
Consider this, too. If Purina was such a bad food, how is it that dogs lifespans have increased in the last 40 years (despite the fact that Purina Dog Food, including Dog Chow) are fed to a massive percentage of pets?
The numbers don’t add up, which is what brings me back to this. Marketing.
Are Purina Dog Food Ingredients Good?
There is not a single ingredient in Purina Dog food that isn’t backed by a lot of research, science, and published information. Purina even states that “Every Ingredient Has a Purpose”.
Here are some common ingredients in Purina foods that are often misunderstood:
Corn – Corn, when used in dog food, can be a valuable and nutritious ingredient. Did you know that corn is more digestible than beef?
It offers an easily utlized energy source that provides the fuel dogs need for their active lifestyles. Furthermore, corn contains essential nutrients like fiber, vitamins, and minerals, which contribute to a well-balanced diet. Corn is definitely not a ‘filler’, nor is it devoid of nutrition. Want to read more about corn in dog food? Check out this article from TUFTS University.
Meat Meals – this misunderstood ingredient is actually a must have in kibble. Meat Meals are simple cooked before they go into the kibble; by grinding and dehydrating meat first, more meat based nutrition can be packed into the finished kibble! Here are some. of the other benefits:
High Protein Content: Meat meal is a concentrated source of protein, as it is made by rendering meat to remove moisture and fat. This makes it an excellent protein source for dogs, supporting their muscle development, growth, and overall health.
Nutrient-Dense: Meat meal is packed with essential nutrients like amino acids, vitamins, and minerals, which are crucial for a dog’s well-being. These nutrients help to maintain a healthy coat, strong bones, and a robust immune system.
Enhanced Flavor: Dogs are natural carnivores, and they typically prefer the taste of meat. Including meat meal in dog food can make it more appealing, encouraging them to eat and enjoy their meals.
Longer Shelf Life: Meat meal’s lower moisture content contributes to a longer shelf life for dog food, reducing the need for artificial preservatives. This can be especially beneficial for owners who want to buy dog food in larger quantities.
Digestibility: High-quality meat meals are highly digestible, meaning that dogs can absorb and utilize the nutrients more effectively. This can be advantageous for dogs with sensitive digestive systems.
Still not convinced? Check out these large breed Purina versions and see what you think:
Influencers, bloggers, pet stores, and pet food brands often disparage big brands because that is how they tap into the emotional side of pet ownership. By pushing those emotional buttons, they can get the sale.
Here are some common marketing deceptions in pet food:
Misleading Imagery: One of the most common tactics is the use of misleading images on packaging that suggest high-quality, whole ingredients like succulent cuts of meat and fresh vegetables (which appeal to us humans). In reality, the actual product inside may contain lower-quality ingredients.
Exaggerated Health Claims: Some pet food brands make exaggerated claims about the health benefits of their products without sufficient scientific evidence to back them up. This can lead pet owners to believe that they are providing the best possible nutrition for their pets when, in fact, they may not be.
Renaming Ingredients: claiming to have “no by-products”, for example, and then hiding them (organ, bone, cartilage) in the ingredients list under different names (editors note, by-products are natural and biologically appropriate)
“Natural” and “Organic” Claims: These terms are often used loosely, and many pet food products labeled as “natural” or “organic” may not meet the rigorous standards that consumers associate with these terms.
Emotional Appeal: Some brands use emotional marketing tactics, such as heartwarming stories or claims of “premium” quality, to create an emotional connection with pet owners, often diverting attention from the actual nutritional content.
Ingredient Splitting: Manufacturers sometimes break down similar ingredients into smaller parts to push more desirable components higher up on the ingredient list, creating the illusion of a higher quality product.
I think the point I’m trying to make here is this:
Feed the food that works for your pet, but make sure you are choosing the food that has science and nutritional research behind it. This means that you might consider Purina or any other “big” brand, despite what marketers and influencers have tried to convince you otherwise.
Anecdotally, Purina saved my dogs life. They thrive on Purina, and I know many, many other dogs that do too. Don’t knock it until you try it 🙂
Victor dog food is a popular option for Great Danes. This week, pet owners across the nation have been shaken by the alarming news of an unprecedented recall involving ALL Victor dog food. The Victor Dog Food recall (2023) affects all formulas with an expiration date before 10/31/24.
The massive nature of the current Victor recall underscores the critical importance of scrutinizing the quality and safety of pet food products, as well as the manufacturing practices of the companies we give our money (and trust to).
As details emerge about the specific reasons behind the Victor recall and the potential risks posed to dogs, we will update this post. In the meanwhile, if you feed Victor foods to your Dane, you must immediately stop. Read on for more information.
Victor Dog Food Recall 2023 Details
Here is what we know about the current Victor food recall:
ALL formulas are affected. If you have Victor in your home that was purchased before November 2023, it’s recalled.
The food may be contaminated with salmonella, which is a bacteria that can lead to symptoms such as diarrhea, fever, and abdominal cramps in humans and animals. In some cases, it can lead to death.
7 human cases of salmonella poisoning have been attributed to Victor Foods, going back as far as January 2023. 6 of those cases are infants.
There are likely many more cases that have not yet been documented
The problem was initially discovered by a random 3rd party test of Victor Hi-Pro Plus that was purchased at a store
There is also a timeline associated with this pet food recall which gives us some valuable (and scary) insight.
Victor brand has “No Recalls” Victor prides itself on having had ‘no recalls’. Enthusiasts of the brand promote this as a badge of honor, not realizing that the company had been selling contaminated food for at least 10 months.
Victor Hi-Pro Plus RecallSeptember 3rd, 2023 The South Carolina Department of Agriculture tests a sample from a random bag of Hi-Pro Plus purchased at a pet store. It tests positive for Salmonella, prompting the first recall which included 644 cases sold in 5-pound bags with lot code 1000016385 and a Best By Date of 4/30/2024(See more here)
Victor Beef & Rice RecallOctober 30th, 2023 3rd party sampling was done again, and 3 lots of Beef & Rice were found to be contaminated with Salmonella. Victor Beef & Rice formulas in 5, 15, and 40 lbs bags with an expiration 06/12/2024 were recalled. (See more here).
Victor Expands the Recall to EverythingNovember 9th, 2023 Days after the Beef & Rice Recall, Victor expanded the recall to include all foods with expiration dates before 10/31/2024. This includes all Victor foods manufactured at the Mid-America pet food plant in Mt. Pleasant, Texas, and formulas from Wayne Feeds, Eagle Mountain, and Members Mark (which are also manufactured by the facility. (See more here). If the bag says Victor, it’s been recalled.
The FDA Releases an Advisory about the Victor RecallNovember 9th, 2023 The FDA created a page in collaboration with the CDC with information about the Mid America Victor Pet Food recall that includes more detailed information about documented illnesses, procedures, recommendations, and the timeline of reported illnesses. (See more here).
Can a Dog Eat Victor Recalled Food?
The FDA, the CDC, and the authors of this blog recommend that Victor Dog Food be destroyed so that no humans or animals can touch or eat it.
Even if your dog seems to have no ill effects, a pet with salmonella in their gut can shed the bacteria in their feces. Additionally, food bowls, your pets eating area, and their saliva may be contaminated and contribute to the spread.
In other words, if your dog is eating salmonella contaminated food and then gives you kisses, you could become sick.
While many people can get over salmonella poisoning at home with a few uncomfortable trips to the toilet, many others end up in the hospital. The CDC considers a salmonella outbreak to be a serious event.
If you have an immunocompromised person, infant, or elderly person in your home it is especially important that you take precautions with food that may be contaminated with salmonella.
We recommend a cold-turkey switch to a brand that meets WSAVA guidelines (more on this below).
If My Dog is Not Sick, Can They Keep Eating Victor?
No.
Many dogs do not show symptoms of Salmonella poisoning (though some do), even if they are actively carrying and shedding the bacteria from their stools and saliva.
Even if your pet seems to be “just fine” eating the Victor dog food in your pantry, it is recommended that you immediately switch.
There is also an ethical dilemma at play if you continue to feed Victor food despite the current recall. We must hold Victor accountable for their poor quality control. By seeking a refund for the potentially contaminated food that you purchased, Victor bears the financial burden of the mistake (as they should).
Additionally, if your pet is shedding salmonella while out and about they could make others sick. This could result from them visiting with kids, going to the nursing home as a therapy dog, pooping in public areas (even if you scoop it up), and other normal activities.
What are the Signs of Salmonella Poisoning
Both dogs and humans can become sick from Salmonella. Now that the Victor recall has been posted, MANY people are realizing that they or their pet had been made ill with food poisoning at some point in 2023, but never considered that it could have been because of their pet’s food.
The symptoms of salmonella poisoning in dogs and humans are very similar:
Nausea (May result in pets turning their nose up at Victor Food)
Diarrhea
Blood in Stool
Vomiting
Lethargy or Low Energy
Fever
Abdominal Cramps
Salmonella infection can also lead to heart problems, eye problems, arthritis, muscle pain, and urinary tract symptoms.
If you or your pet have had these symptoms, and your pet was eating Victor food (or one of the other brands included in the current expanded recall), you are encouraged to report it to your veterinarian, your doctor, and the FDA.
Salmonella is not destroyed by freezing temperatures.
Killing or eliminating Salmonella involves thorough cooking of contaminated food items. Cooking your pets kibble to destroy any potential salmonella contamination is not recommended, however, as this may alter the nutritional balance of the food.
Practicing good hygiene by washing hands thoroughly with soap and water after handling Victor kibble or coming into contact with potentially contaminated surfaces is essential. After you dispose of your Victor food, thoroughly wash and sanitize the feeding area, scoops, and bowls.
If you use a pet food storage container, it must also be thoroughly sanitized.
Unfortunately, dish soap doesn’t kill bacteria; so depending on how thoroughly you wash something, it may still require sanitization. If your dishwasher has such a cycle, we recommend using it!
If you have been affected by the Mid America Victor food recall and need alternative foods, we recommend sticking to brands that meet WSAVA guidelines and thus, have exceptional quality control practices.
Pet food manufacturers that meet WSAVA recommendations have transparency in pet food labeling, exceptional quality control, and highly qualified nutritionists involved with the formulation of the food.
Here is our list of pet foods that meet WSAVA recommendations, are ideal for large & giant breed dogs, and provide a veterinary-approved alternative to Victor pet foods. If you are shopping for a small or senior dog, choose a comparable formula from the same company:
Check out THE GIANT DOG FOOD PROJECT to compare brands and values.
If you are looking to stay away from the “Big 5” for some reason (though, we urge you to reconsider), other brands that are close contenders include grain-inclusive Farmina, Annamaet, and Instinct Kibbles.
How to Switch from Victor to Another Brand
It is important that you immediately stop feeding Victor altogether. We recognize that this can be upsetting for pet owners that feel their pet has done well on Victor food. However, there are many alternatives out there and switching quickly is important!
Once you have chosen a food, thoroughly sanitize your pets eating area and then offer a SMALL meal of the new food.
Instead of offering two meals, offer 3-4. Split the food up over the course of the day.
Additionally, for the first few days, reduce the overall amount that you offer! Many pets want to gorge on new food because it’s novel and interesting; do NOT allow this unless you want a yard full of poop!
Check the feeding recommendations on the bag, too. Chances are, you can feed LESS food if you choose a brand like Purina Pro Plan, Royal Canin, or Hill’s! Overfeeding is a COMMON cause of loose stools and the nutritional values will likely be different on a new food that you choose.
We recommend shopping at Petsmart or Chewy, and choosing autoship to save money and time. If your pup has digestive upset for more than a few days, see your veterinarian!
Victor Pet Food Quality Control & Recalls
It’s crucial to understand that recalls aren’t inherently negative. Some companies promptly issue small recalls as a testament to their commitment to prioritizing pet health over marketing and profits.
However, the magnitude and context of the recall involving Victor pet foods serve as a clear example of a problematic recall, prompting a reassessment of our perception of the brand.
Many people have rewarded Victor for having had “no recalls” in the past.
We can now clearly see that this was misguided, as the current recall shows a problematic issue with quality control.
The reality is that a company boasting “no recalls” may simply be overlooking (or worse, ignoring) potential issues.
Pet food manufacturers should prioritize routine and thorough equipment sanitization, along with batch testing, to virtually eliminate the risk of pathogens like aflatoxins, salmonella, and E. coli in their products.
The salmonella contamination in Mid America Pet food was caught twice by 3rd party testing, not the company itself. This is a glaring indication that a crucial step was missed.
Salmonella poisoning cases associated with this outbreak date back into January, 9 months prior to the first recall. This is an indication that contaminated food has been on store shelves for the better part of a year. For many pet owners, this has explained a lot of problematic symptoms they had seen in their pets for the last several months.
A quick search through many Facebook dog groups indicates that many pets have actually been sick. It took a massive recall for people to figure out why.
How has Mid America Pet Foods Responded to the Recall?
Unfortunately, Mid America (the makers of Victor foods, as well as the manufacturing plant for Eagle Pack, Wayne Feeds, and Member’s Mark which were also recalled) has had a questionable response to the recall.
Numerous pet owners mention enduring lengthy waits on hold, spending hours waiting to connect with a representative only to be told that “Victor cares”.
Other individuals have surfaced, expressing concerns about Victor pet food causing illness in their pets before the recall. After reaching out to Victor about this, these owners consistently cite that the company failed to acknowledge any responsibility for the reported issues.
Worse, Victor representatives are telling some people that the salmonella recall was done out of “an abundance of caution” and that the Beef & Rice formula is truly the only affected one.
Given that the problem was found twice by a 3rd party test, and that salmonella is easily spread when food is exposed to contaminated manufacturing equipment, I’m not inclined to buy into their desperate plea to brush this off as “no big deal”.
The designation of a recall as “voluntary” does not necessarily imply that it was initiated solely at the company’s discretion.
Rather, it indicates that the company took the proactive step of reaching out to suppliers and informing consumers. This designation does not rule out the possibility that the FDA exerted pressure, or that the company could have faced regulatory action if it had not taken this initiative.
In cases where companies are under serious scrutiny from the FDA and CDC (as is the case with Mid America Food at the moment), opting for a “voluntary recall” notice can be viewed as a strategic marketing move to stay ahead of potential regulatory actions.
Does Victor Dog Food Meet WSAVA Guidelines?
The solid majority of veterinarians, who see 100’s of pets each week and share advice passed down to them from board certified veterinary nutritionists will recommend foods that meet WSAVA guidelines. These foods include brands such as Purina, Iam’s, Eukanuba, Hill’s, and Royal Canin.
Victor foods do not, and have never come even close to meeting WSAVA manufacturing and formulation recommendations. Here is a simple list of reasons why they do not adhere to basic ethics:
Victor foods does NOT have a qualified nutritionist on staff. Their ‘head chef’ has a science degree and an online certificate in companion animals from a farm animal organization.
Victor foods do not perform feeding trials or contribute to research with peer-reviewed science
Victor foods does not easily provide nutritional values on request: when we inquired about their calcium levels, we were told they would only speak on the phone (not in writing). They only publish their calcium levels on select bags and they do not share a guaranteed analysis of calcium, leaving owners to dig for this very important information.
Victor does not have good sanitation protocols and does not perform regular bacteriology screenings on their foods (an observation implied by the evidence, which indicates that they have been selling salmonella contaminated food since at least January, 2023.
There is a reason that veterinarians always recommend that pet owners look past pet food marketing and instead, into the companies dedication to animal health, formulation, and quality control.
Victor Pet Foods for Puppies
We do not recommend Victor pet foods for puppies, as the calcium levels are too high to be safe for growing large and giant breed dogs.
Buckle up for an epic rant, sparked by a heated discussion I had in our Great Dane Owners Facebook Group. A self-proclaimed dog “nutritionist” dropped some eyebrow-raising claims, complete with conspiracies and bold, inflammatory statements about pet food, cancer, and poison. It served as a stark reminder of the potential dangers that misinformation in social media pet care can unleash.
We need to talk about this. I’m going to dig into the complexity of how misguided advice online can impact our beloved pets, our own opinions, and the big dog community at large.
I’m a firm believer in “live and let live”, but I do draw the line on predatory misinformation, fake or overstated credentials, pseudoscience, and general quackery. These things are absolutely harming our pets. So in an effort to avoid turning this post into a deranged, epic rant I’m going to organize my thoughts.
Here is what we need to talk about:
The difference between a “certified nutritionist” and legitimate nutritionist credentials
How misinformation and disinformation in pet care is leading to health problems, malnutrition, and even abuse
How to spot quacks, nonsense conspiracies, and predatory social marketing
Some myth busting Q&A
How Misinformation in Social Media Pet Care Impacts Us
The impact of misinformation in social media pet care reverberates through the entire pet-owning community, affecting each one of us. With the proliferation of often well-intentioned but inaccurate advice circulating on platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Tik Tok, pet owners often find themselves navigating a maze of conflicting information.
From dietary fads to unverified medical or ‘holistic’ remedies, the consequences of this content can range from ineffective treatments to potentially harmful practices.
Moreover, the spreading of baseless claims and sensationalized stories can create unnecessary panic and anxiety among pet owners, leading to decisions based on fear rather than sound judgment.
Predatory influencers (including many celebrity veterinarians) often exploit pet owners’ anxieties, skillfully using deliberate misinformation as a marketing tool to drive sales of various pet products and services. This tactic is easy to spot once you know what to look for, however!
As a collective responsibility, it becomes imperative for pet owners to critically assess information, seek guidance from reliable sources, and foster a community built on accurate knowledge.
A Tall Tale from a Certified Canine Nutritionist
In a discussion this week about what to feed our Great Danes, a Certified Canine Nutritionist popped in with a list of credentials that they believed gave them authority on the topic.
[Authors note: the comments below were posted in a forum with over 31K members. So while their comments are public, I’ve paraphrased the original writing so they might remain anonymous.]
“With three decades of experience in the dog industry, I bring expertise as a behaviorist and nutritionist. I own a doggie daycare, boarding, and grooming business and have insight into what people feed their dogs. So many people are feeding their dogs pure poison! Veterinarians don’t actually know anything about nutrition. I’ve seen dogs cured of some cancers after I educated them.I have insider knowledge on how the pet industry really works and so many of you people are stupid. My non-disclosure agreement means I can’t share my sources, but they are real. Your dogs will die young and it’s all your fault. Good luck with your sickly dogs!”
Now, I don’t know about you…but this is NOT how most credentialed, highly educated people act. Within just that short paragraph we are seeing many signs of predatory, misleading behavior including:
Positioning themselves as an authority figure, while blatantly disparaging those (veterinarians) with more advanced credentials
Inflammatory, anxiety inducing claims utilizing key words such as “poison”
Pseudoscience (is supposedly able to cure cancer)
Has “insider knowledge” from sources they cannot name
Is intentionally fostering fear, guilt, and anxiety
Pet Nutritionist Credentials
Curious about their background, I delved into their credentials. This individual asserted they had studied zoology, positioning this qualification as a mark of expertise. The irony is hard to miss, though, as in the very same breath, they declared, “Veterinarians don’t know anything about nutrition.“
Hold on a moment. So, a practicing veterinarian who sees 100’s of pets each week, carries a B.S. in Animal Science and a Doctorate in Veterinary Medicine, and that has extensive training and education in animal health, supposedly knows nothing about pet nutrition?
Meanwhile, a dog groomer with an unused zoology degree is considered an authority on the subject. The irony here is certainly hard to ignore. I’m immediately suspicious, and you should be, too!
Pet Nutritionist vs. Veterinary Nutritionist
It’s essential for pet owners to discern between a pet nutritionist and a veterinary nutritionist when digesting information about pet care and nutrition.
Here are some very common Pet Nutritionist titles:
Certified Pet Nutritionist
Certified Canine Nutritionist
Pet Nutrition Expert
Dog Nutrition Expert
Animal Nutritionist
Holistic Pet Nutritionist
Holistic Pet Nutrition Consultant
Natural Dog Nutrition Specialist
Veterinary Nutritionist
Only ONE Of the titles on the above list is a truly educated and credentialed authority on the topic of pet nutrition. Can you guess which one?
A pet nutritionist (any person with a title who is NOT a Board Certified Veterinary Nutritionist) often obtains certifications through various online courses.
These online courses typically require no prerequisites (anybody can take them, regardless of their past education), usually take less than 10 hours to complete, and can be as affordable as just $10.
To put this simply, anybody can become a “Certified Nutritionist” for pets, and market themselves as an expert.
On the other hand, a veterinary nutritionist is a licensed veterinarian who has pursued advanced education and specialization in companion animal nutrition, providing a more comprehensive approach to a pet’s dietary needs.
Interestingly enough, the “pet nutritionists” advice is often at odds with the information shared by boarded Veterinary Nutritionists.
BK Pets, a popular influencer on Tik Tok, stands out as a prime example of a popular “Pet Nutritionist” with a large following, exaggerated credentials, and an abundance of affiliate links and big money brand deals. His content often includes misleading information that denounces veterinarians, not to mention pet care nutritional advice that diverges from scientific and mainstream opinion.
Veterinarians aspiring to become board-certified in veterinary nutrition undergo extensive postgraduate training, which includes completing a residency program focused on nutrition, conducting original research, and authoring scientific publications. After fulfilling these stringent requirements, candidates must successfully pass a comprehensive 2-day long examination to demonstrate their proficiency.
The distinction between the two underscores the importance of ensuring that the nutritional guidance sought for pets is backed by a solid foundation in both nutrition and veterinary medicine.
Because the truth is, anybody can claim to be an ‘expert’ and spread dangerous misinformation with no checks and balances. But only a few truly are experts.
How Disinformation on Social Media Leads to Abuse
Disinformation on social media platforms from unregulated, unchecked ‘experts’ has unfortunately created a viral breeding ground for misinformation, conflicting opinions, and conspiracies.
False narratives, misguided advice, and sensationalized stories about cancer, toxins, and veterinarians circulating on social media are damaging.
Well-intentioned but misinformed individuals may adopt harmful care practices, misguided diets, or questionable training methods, believing they are acting in the best interest of their pets.
In some pet care groups, boasting thousands of engaged members, the go-to advice is often to choose an herb, essential oil, or “holistic” supplement or diet rather than seeking proper veterinary care. It’s heartbreaking, especially when animals are dealing with painful or damaging conditions that could be easily treated or even prevented.
This approach, neglecting essential medical attention in favor of alternative remedies, is a concerning form of pet abuse that doesn’t get the attention it deserves. There is an epidemic of ‘experts’ online ready and willing to solve all of your anxieties and fears with a ‘remedy’.
Remember the snake oil salesmen in the 1800’s? Let’s not forget history.
The Woo-to-Q and Crunchy Cult Pipelines
The “Woo to Q” and “Crunchy Cult” phenomenon is driven by social media. They represent a trend where pet owners increasingly lean towards unconventional and alternative approaches to pet care. “Woo” denotes practices that may lack scientific backing, often bordering on pseudoscience. The same mentality is what drives people towards Q, the conservative conspiracy group.
The Crunchy Cult refers to a community that embraces an ultra-natural and holistic lifestyle for their pets, including raw diets, herbal remedies, and eschewing conventional veterinary practices.
While some of these approaches may have merit, the phenomenon underscores a growing skepticism towards traditional pet care norms, veterinary medicine, and peer reviewed science.
It prompts reflection on the balance between exploring alternative options and ensuring that our pets receive evidence-based, reliable care to maintain their health and well-being.
As with all things in pet care, there is a direct parallel to the same trends in human health, wellness, and raising children.
How Pseudoscience & Misinformation is Profitable for Pet Influencers
This segment is not only thought-provoking but might also spark some controversy. What I’m about to share could push you out of your comfort zone, and that’s completely fine! Experiencing cognitive dissonance is a natural part of the process.
The intentional, deliberate, and predatory promotion of pseudoscience and misinformation has become an extremely lucrative career for many pet influencers on social media.
Notably, figures like Dr. Karen Becker, Dr. Judy Morgan, Dr. Marty, and BK Pets have large followings. These influencers frequently deviate from widely accepted advice. They openly deprecate practicing veterinarians and established research while endorsing ‘holistic’ pet care suggestions.
Leveraging their online platforms, these celebrity veterinarians and the “pet nutritionists” who follow them often peddle unverified health advice, cherry-picked studies, controversial statements, and questionable pet care practices to a receptive audience.
By sharing information that at times may even be inflammatory (for example, “kibble causes cancer”), they easily generate clicks, likes, follows, and sales.
While their charismatic presentation and seemingly authoritative demeanor may attract followers who are ready and willing to spend money on their beloved pets, it’s crucial to scrutinize the factual foundation of their information.
The profitability of pseudoscience in the pet influencer realm raises concerns about the potential impact on pet owners who might unknowingly adopt practices that lack scientific backing.
Pet Nutrition Influencers & How Anxiety Sells
What adds to the complexity of this situation is that these influencers do, on occasion, provide valuable and helpful content. However, the concern arises when they intentionally diverge from mainstream opinions, using their influence to instill fear and anxiety among their followers.
The truth is, fear and anxiety are marketable. It’s relatively simple to persuade someone to buy into an online course, invest in an expensive supplement, or adopt a homemade pet food recipe if they’re motivated by the fear of potential consequences. The exploitation of fear for profit raises ethical questions about the intersection of pet care and commerce in the influencer sphere.
How to Spot Quacks, Nonsense Conspiracies, and Predatory Social Marketing
Let’s start with a friendly tip: check out the credentials and expertise of the folks sharing advice.**
Qualified professionals will have legitimate qualifications, often holding degrees or certifications from reputable institutions. Of course, there are many quacks with degrees (Dr. Mercola comes to mind) but this is a good place to start, especially if you are comparing a credentialed professional (DACVN) to a ‘pet nutritionist’ with an online certificate.
Now, about those conspiracies floating around social media – they can be tricky.
Look out for stories that are overly dramatic or try to scare you. Conspiracies often play on our emotions, especially fear and outrage. To spot these, be vigilant about overly dramatic or fear-inducing narratives designed to exploit emotions, capitalizing on fear and outrage.
Made Up Stories
While working on this blog, I took a break to check on our Facebook group (we are in the middle of the unprecedented Victor Pet Food recall and the group is buzzing). I saw that somebody had asserted that a specific brand of food (not Victor) had caused harm to their pet.
Seeking more details, I received only a vague response about “spiders and bugs.” We all know pets eat bugs off the ground, so it seemed like a BIG stretch. I inquired further, and the narrative suddenly shifted to the presence of ‘chemicals’ in the food being the issue.
In essence, it became apparent that this was a fabricated story crafted to evoke fear, anxiety, and promote conspiracies. It’s likely that their pet succumbed to a different cause. The owner then seized the opportunity to spread misinformation about a particular brand, which became their priority. This is a great example of social media driven misinformation!
Keep an eye out for transparency and accountability. The good sources back up what they say with evidence and point to reliable studies. They’re upfront about any possible conflicts of interest, too. If someone’s making big claims and seems motivated to sell something as an alternative, that’s a sign to be cautious.
**As the author of this blog, I recognize the clear issue of expertise and being a ‘self proclaimed expert’ in big dogs. It’s important to note that when we provide information on this blog, every effort is made to ensure that recommendations are backed by science and the popular opinion of credentialed professionals. We always cite our sources and adhere to established guidelines. You may find our content & liability disclosure of interest.
Social Media Misinformation Red Flags
Recognizing red flags indicative of misinformation, snake oil, and general quackery are the key to ensuring that the information you digest about your pet’s health is rooted in actual evidence. Here are our top pet care social media misinformation red flags:
Unverified Credentials: Exercise caution when taking advice from individuals without recognizable and legitimate qualifications or certifications. This is especially if they claim to know more than somebody who is a practicing, board certified veterinarian. Genuine experts usually maintain transparent and credible credentials, or they openly acknowledge that their information is sourced from credentialed professionals.
Sensationalized Claims: Watch out for overly dramatic or fear-inducing narratives. Misinformation often relies on emotions, playing on fear or urgency to capture attention.
Lack of Evidence-Based Information: Reliable sources provide evidence-based information and cite reputable studies. Red flags include vague references, unsupported claims, or the absence of credible sources. They may say “I know things but cannot disclose how I know them, for example.
Conflict of Interest: Transparent and trustworthy influencers disclose any potential conflicts of interest. If someone appears more focused on promoting products for profit than providing accurate information, it’s a red flag.
Grand Promises: Be wary of pet care advice that makes grand promises or guarantees. Genuine experts emphasize the complexity of animal health and well-being rather than offering magical fixes.
Emotionally Charged Language: Misleading influencers often use emotionally charged language to sway opinions. If the content relies heavily on emotions rather than factual information, approach with caution.
Urgency and Impulsivity: Influencers employing manipulative tactics, such as creating a sense of urgency to encourage impulsive purchases, may prioritize profit over the well-being of pets.
Exclusivity or Fear of Missing Out (FOMO): By criticizing those outside their circle, they cultivate a core sense of elitism. This fosters loyalty to the ideas they promote. These influencers share “secrets” and “inside information” that you can only get from them.
Discrediting Established Professionals: Red flags may arise when influencers openly criticize or deprecate practicing veterinarians, researchers, or institutions. This is often done without credible reasons or evidence.
Misleading Transparency: If details about an influencer are unclear or undisclosed, approach with caution. Unfortunately, many influencers are VERY good at selling, and sell themselves as ‘authorities’ when they are anything but.
How Some Pet Care Social Influencers Parallel Cults
Influencers within the natural pet care movement (in particular) often display characteristics reminiscent of cult-like behavior. Yeah, I said it.
There’s a clear delineation between those deemed “in the know” and those on the outside, creating an elitist atmosphere. Loyalty to specific beliefs, brands, and practices are rewarded, fostering a sense of allegiance that can be challenging to question. The movement often places a heavy emphasis on individual experiences and anecdotes over peer reviewed research and evidence (this is a KEY difference), discouraging dissent and promoting a unified front.
Charismatic Leadership
Influential figures become the sole arbiters of truth. They are easily followed by people who want to also be “in the know” because they are engaging and appear trustworthy. The devout followers then share the content and cite it as truth. This is done even when it completely defies the popular opinion, actual science or even common sense.
Questioning of Established Knowledge & Practices
By pitting pet owners against their veterinarians, the charismatic leaders establish authority and strengthen their followers isolation from the community. Claims that large pet food brands, veterinary nutritionists, vaccines, and preventatives are all corrupt, toxic and damaging are made. This is a deliberate attempt to drive a wedge between the pet parent and their pets’ health care professional.
This dynamic is frequently observed in marketing strategies as well. Pet food brands frequently strive to distinguish themselves in the market. By making extravagant claims about the supposed ‘harmful’, ‘gross’, or ‘toxic’ ingredients or formulas of competing brands, they can upsell themselves. This occurs even when the brands they criticize have a well-established history supported by nutritional science and research.
Generating Unreasonable Fears
By driving anxiety and exaggerated claims about pet foods, brands, and veterinary care, followers develop unreasonable fears that are hard to overcome. For instance, if a prominent influencer declares that “kibble causes cancer,” this can trigger heightened anxiety among followers who are deprived of accurate statistics and scientific information on the subject.
Many pet parents have developed misguided concerns regarding pet food ingredients, recalls, and the presence of “chemicals.” While it’s beneficial to consistently inquire and seek information, when fear takes precedence over our capacity to think critically about our pet’s health (and hear what the real experts say about it), fear emerges as the victor.
Making Followers Feel Inadequate
There’s a strong push to “do better” for our pets, often accompanied by the insistence that pet parents must invest more money, time, and resources to meet a certain standard. For those without the financial means to justify splurging on expensive kibbles and ‘fresh’ foods, this narrative can be particularly distressing.
Followers might find themselves in debt or grappling with intense guilt as they strive to address this issue and meet the influencer’s expectations of “building a better bowl.”
They are Always Right, Everybody Else is Wrong
Even when challenged with evidence and peer reviewed science, the charismatic leader is unwavering and unwilling to explore a change in mindset.
Meanwhile, pets continue to be harmed by certain food formulations.
They Have Insider Information
This individual claims to possess exclusive ‘insider information’ and is positioned as the sole authority with direct access to the “truth,” which they impart to their followers. In their perspective, no other information is deemed credible. A notable illustration of this behavior could be an influencer asserting that “Veterinarians receive kickbacks.”
Even if 20 other veterinarians debunk this notion, the influencer insists they are correct, citing their personal experience working with one veterinarian as the source of their supposed truth. The belief in their authority on the subject overrides any conflicting evidence from multiple legitimate sources.
As this movement gains traction, it is essential for pet owners to approach holistic pet care with a discerning mindset, valuing evidence-based practices and seeking a balance between alternative approaches and conventional veterinary care.
Pet Care Myth Busting
I’ve said a lot, but thought it might be important to throw in one last pet care Q&A.
The allure of captivating and sensational pet care content draws many people into false narratives. Thankfully, if you’ve made it this far into my article today you’re well on your way to being an educated and science-minded pet owner who uses critical thinking.
5 Myths in Pets
There are frequently propagated by social influencers and celebrity veterinarians in pursuit of likes, clicks, and affiliate profits.
Raw Diets Cure Everything: A prevalent myth in the ‘holistic’ dog community is the belief that feeding a raw diet can miraculously cure various health issues. While a balanced diet is crucial for a dog’s well-being, claiming that raw diets are a panacea oversimplifies the complexity of health conditions and the importance of veterinary care.
Vaccinations Are Harmful: Some individuals propagate the myth that vaccinations are inherently harmful and should be avoided. In reality, vaccinations play a crucial role in preventing serious and potentially life-threatening diseases, and their benefits far outweigh the minimal risks.
Chemical-Free Is Always Better: There’s a common misconception that avoiding all chemicals is the key to optimal pet health. However, this myth oversimplifies the complexity of chemistry and ignores the fact that not all chemicals are harmful. Essential medications, flea preventatives, and other scientifically formulated treatments can be vital for a pet’s health. Let us not forget that essential oils are in fact chemicals, too.
All Commercial Dog Food Is Unhealthy: Most “pet nutritionists” argue that all commercial dog food is unhealthy and can cause cancer. They often advocate for boutique kibbles or homemade diets, (often depending on which pet food company pays them the most). While there are high-quality commercial dog foods, perpetuating the belief that they are universally harmful oversimplifies the diverse and well researched options available and may lead to unbalanced diets. Additionally, this elitist, classist position uses fear to promote the false and dangerous idea that pet parents must spend a lot of money and time on “higher quality” foods and supplements.
Natural Remedies Always Trump Medications: Another prevalent myth is the belief that natural remedies are always superior to conventional medications. While some natural remedies can complement traditional treatments, they may not always be sufficient or appropriate for certain medical conditions. Relying solely on natural remedies without professional guidance can compromise a pet’s health.
Don’t Be a Victim
The landscape of pet care on social media is marked by both valuable insights and nonsense misinformation. While influencers and online communities can offer helpful advice, it is crucial for pet owners to approach information with a discerning eye.
The allure of sensationalized content, unfounded claims, and the promotion of exclusive ideologies can lead to the propagation of myths that may adversely impact our pets’ well-being. As responsible pet caregivers, we must prioritize evidence-based information, consult qualified professionals, and foster a community that values transparent, science-backed practices.
By navigating the digital realm cautiously, we can ensure that our pets receive the care they deserve, steering clear of the pitfalls of social media misinformation.
